Background: Recently it has been shown that biphasic external shocks are more effective in the treatment of ventricular fibrillation (VF) compared with monophasic external shocks in terms of number of defibrillation attempts and maximal energy used for termination of VF. Biphasic defibrillators apply different biphasic impulse forms, depending on technology. To the authors' knowledge, there are no existing data concerning the effects of rectilinear biphasic internal shocks in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. The purpose of this study was to compare monophasic with rectilinear biphasic internal shock waveforms for termination of VF in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.
Methods: One hundred thirty-four patients scheduled for elective cardiac surgery were prospectively randomized either to monophasic (group A) or biphasic (group B) internal defibrillation. Defibrillation was started with 7 J and increased stepwise to 30 J in each group until successful termination of VF after aortic declamping. The number of defibrillations, as well as the cumulative and maximal energy for termination of VF, were determined. Preoperatively, intraoperatively, and postoperatively troponin T, total creatine phosphokinase (CPK), and CPK- MB isoenzymes were measured.
Results: In 64 patients (47%) VF occurred. The groups consisted of 32 patients each. The number of defibrillations (1.3 +/- 0.6 v 1.9+/- 1.2; p = 0.013), maximal energy per patient (7.9 +/- 2.5 v 11.6 +/- 7.32; p = 0.006), and cumulative energy (10.1 +/-6.1 v 21.3 +/- 24.1; p = 0.016) for successful termination of VF were significantly reduced in group B. Troponin T, CPK, and CPK-MB did not differ between groups.
Conclusions: Results of this study indicate that rectilinear biphasic internal defibrillation is more effective in the treatment of VF during cardiac surgery than is monophasic defibrillation. However, no significant difference in myocardial damage could be detected between groups.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2005.06.002 | DOI Listing |
Europace
February 2023
Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario L8P 1H6, Canada.
Aims: Electrical cardioversion is commonly used to restore sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), but procedural technique and clinical success vary. We sought to identify techniques associated with electrical cardioversion success for AF patients.
Methods And Results: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and the grey literature from inception to October 2022.
Resuscitation
March 2016
Instituto de Cardiologia do Rio Grande do Sul, Fundação Universitária de Cardiologia (ICFUC), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Objectives: Conduct a systematic review of the literature to compare the efficacy of different biphasic and monophasic shock waveforms technologies for transthoracic cardioversion of Atrial Fibrillation (AF).
Methods: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, LILACS and ClinicalTrials.gov databases for randomized clinical trials comparing two or more defibrillation waveforms when performing elective transthoracic cardioversion of AF.
Sensors (Basel)
September 2015
Centre for Advanced Cardiovascular Research, Ulster University, BT37 0QB, UK.
A wireless powered implantable atrial defibrillator consisting of a battery driven hand-held radio frequency (RF) power transmitter (ex vivo) and a passive (battery free) implantable power receiver (in vivo) that enables measurement of the intracardiac impedance (ICI) during internal atrial defibrillation is reported. The architecture is designed to operate in two modes: Cardiac sense mode (power-up, measure the impedance of the cardiac substrate and communicate data to the ex vivo power transmitter) and cardiac shock mode (delivery of a synchronised very low tilt rectilinear electrical shock waveform). An initial prototype was implemented and tested.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFResuscitation
October 2014
School of Biomedical Engineering, Third Military Medical University and Chongqing University, Chongqing, China. Electronic address:
Objective: Defibrillation current has been shown to be a clinically more relevant dosing unit than energy. However, the effects of average and peak current in determining shock outcome are still undetermined. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between average current, peak current and defibrillation success when different biphasic waveforms were employed.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFResuscitation
November 2013
AREU Azienda Regionale Emergenza Urgenza (Lombardia Regional Emergency Service), Italy. Electronic address:
Aim: Assessment and comparison of the electrical parameters (energy, current, first and second phase waveform duration) among eighteen AEDs.
Method: Engineering bench tests for a descriptive systematic evaluation in commercially available AEDs. AEDs were tested through an ECG simulator, an impedance simulator, an oscilloscope and a measuring device detecting energy delivered, peak and average current, and duration of first and second phase of the biphasic waveforms.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!