Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
This article evaluates the valence sensitivity and accuracy of selected EELS white-line extraction methods based on the white-line intensity ratio in case of manganese oxides, predominantly in the valency range [Mn3+ ; Mn4+]. For this purpose Mn-L2,3 ionization edges of several Mn oxides were measured and four different methods were applied to extract the intensities. The obtained ratios have been analyzed in terms of their errors, their scatter, and their sensitivity on manganese valency. We found that the maximum-intensity as well as the Pearson and Walsh-Dray methods show larger relative changes of the ratio between Mn3+ and Mn4+ than curve-fitting. Taking the scatter into account, Walsh-Dray distinguishes more clearly between those two valencies than curve-fitting. Thus the Walsh-Dray method promises the most accurate determination of small valency shifts.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2005.09.002 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!