Objective: To compare the clinical values of computed tomography (CT) and fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron remission tomography (FDG-PET) in diagnosis of mediastinal metastasis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods: Sixty patients with respectable NSCLC underwent CT and FDG-PET with an interval of 2 weeks and then underwent thoracotomy for clearance of the lymph nodes or biopsy of the mediastinal lymph nodes via mediastinoscopy. The specimens of mediastinal lymph node underwent HE staining and PCNA/Ki67 immunohistochemical staining. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive prediction value, and negative prediction value in diagnosis of metastasis of mediastinal lymph nodes of these 2 procedures were compared.

Results: The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive prediction value, and negative prediction value in diagnosis of metastasis of mediastinal lymph nodes were 92.3%, 87.5%, 91.2%, 96.0%, and 77.7% respectively for FDG-PET, and were 76.9%, 50.0%, 70.6%, 83.3%, and 40.0% respectively for CT. The sensitivity rate was 98% for CT plus FDG-PET.

Conclusion: PET is superior to CT in diagnosis of metastasis of NSCLC to mediastinal lymph nodes. PET + CT significantly increases the sensitivity in diagnosis.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

lymph nodes
20
mediastinal lymph
20
diagnosis metastasis
12
computed tomography
8
tomography fluorine-18
8
fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose
8
fluorodeoxyglucose positron
8
positron remission
8
remission tomography
8
diagnosis mediastinal
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!