Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT Magna bioprosthesis: a stented valve with stentless performance?

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg

Cardiac Surgery Division, Regional Cardiac Centre, Morriston Hospital, Swansea, United Kingdom.

Published: December 2005

Objective: We designed this study to evaluate the early hemodynamic performance of the recently introduced Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT Magna bioprosthesis (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, Calif) and compare it with those of the conventional Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT stented bioprosthesis (Edwards Lifesciences) and Edwards Prima Plus porcine stentless bioprosthesis (Edwards Lifesciences).

Methods: Sixty-three patients (>70 years old) were enrolled in this prospective, randomized study. At operation, once the annulus had been measured, the best size suitable was assessed for each of the three valves before random assignment. Transthoracic echocardiography was performed before discharge to evaluate early postoperative hemodynamic performances of the different valves implanted.

Results: The best size suitable of Edwards Prima Plus (24.3 +/- 1.7 mm) was significantly superior to those of both the Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT Magna (23.4 +/- 2.1 mm) and Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT (22.4 +/- 1.8 mm). The best size suitable of the Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT Magna, however, was significantly superior to that of the Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT. Furthermore the best size suitable of the Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT Magna was equal to the measured annulus in 55% of patients, as opposed to 25% for the Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT (P < .001). Mean implanted labeled size of the Edwards Prima Plus was significantly higher than those of both the Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT Magna and the Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT (24.6 +/- 1.9 mm, 23.1 +/- 1.9 mm, and 22.5 +/- 1.8 mm, respectively). Early postoperative hemodynamic performance of the Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT Magna, however, was superior to those of both the Edwards Prima Plus and the Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT in both effective orifice area index (1.07 +/- 0.4 cm2/m2, 0.87 +/- 0.3 cm2/m2, and 0.80 +/- 0.2 cm2/m2, respectively) and mean peak gradient (20 +/- 6 mm Hg, 27 +/- 8 mm Hg, and 28 +/- 12 mm Hg, respectively).

Conclusion: The improved design of the recently introduced third-generation stented bioprosthesis Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT Magna allows implantation of a significantly bigger valve than with the old generation. Furthermore, the improved hemodynamic performance of the Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT Magna compares favorably with both the Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT and the Edwards Prima Plus.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2005.07.011DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

carpentier-edwards perimount
64
perimount magna
36
edwards prima
20
carpentier-edwards
16
best size
16
size suitable
16
perimount
15
hemodynamic performance
12
bioprosthesis edwards
12
+/-
12

Similar Publications

Background: Takayasu arteritis is a large-vessel vasculitis, in addition to giant cell arteritis. Various post-operative complications associated with the cardiac macrovasculature have been reported. Detachment of the prosthetic valve, pseudoaneurysm formation, and dilatation of the aortic root are well-known post-operative complications associated with vasculitis syndromes, including Takayasu arteritis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Balloon-assisted bioprosthetic or native aortic scallop intentional laceration to prevent iatrogenic coronary artery obstruction (BA-BASILICA) enables valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation (ViV-TAVI) in patients at risk of coronary artery obstruction. However, its efficacy in patients with severely calcified leaflets remains unclear.

Case Summary: We report a 78-year-old woman with a deteriorated 21 mm Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT Magna valve.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aortic valve replacement (AVR) in a patient with a bio-Bentall conduit can be very challenging, especially if there was a previous endocarditis process for significant morbidity and mortality. We report a case of sutureless AVR in an old patient with a bio-Bentall conduit (Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Magna Ease 25 aortic valve and Hemashield 30 aortic conduit), who developed an endocarditis on aortic prosthesis valve. We believe that sutureless AVR is the best option for redo-operation in older patients with a high surgical risk because it allows for easy rapid deployment implantation, avoids anchoring sutures on a fragile aortic anulus, and reduces cardiopulmonary and aortic cross-clamp times.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Adaptation of Aortic Bioprosthetic Valves for Pulmonary Position: Comparative Analysis of Transcatheter and Surgical Valves.

J Cardiovasc Transl Res

December 2024

Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, University of Denver, 2155 E. Wesley Ave, Room 439, Denver, CO, 80208, USA.

Article Synopsis
  • Pulmonary valve dysfunction is frequent in congenital heart disease, often requiring procedures like right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction, with transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement (TPVR) now being a successful alternative to traditional surgery.
  • This study compares two bioprosthetic valves: the Carpentier Edwards Perimount Magna Ease surgical valve and the Edwards SAPIEN 3 transcatheter valve, noting that the latter was originally designed for aortic use but has been adapted for pulmonary applications.
  • Significant differences were observed in the hydrodynamic and structural characteristics of the valves under pulmonary and aortic conditions, enhancing the understanding of the biomechanics involved in both surgical and transcatheter replacements.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) using veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is widely implemented as a rescue device in transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Although prophylactic VA-ECMO (pECMO) in TAVI is preferable to emergency VA-ECMO (eECMO) in terms of overall survival, there is currently no consensus on the introduction criteria for pECMO. Here, we report four cases of eECMO and pECMO performed in valve-in-valve TAVI (ViV-TAVI) with a small surgical bioprosthesis to consider the validity of the current pECMO indications.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!