Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Advances in the understanding of acute otitis media (AOM), lessons learned from antibacterial trials, and the emergence of pathogens with decreased susceptibility to commonly used antibiotics explain the need to redefine the role of tympanocentesis. The diagnostic value of tympanocentesis at baseline to establish the bacterial cause of AOM is well accepted. However, relevant ethical and scientific arguments conclude that repeat (or double) tympanocentesis cannot be recommended as routine procedure, either for the individual patient or for each treatment trial. Relevant aspects on trial design for AOM, with special emphasis on the value of double tympanocentesis, are reviewed.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1592/phco.2005.25.12part2.105S | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!