Urine immunoassays are commonly used as a rapid screen for drugs of abuse in emergency room, hospital, clinic, and forensic settings. The authors were concerned whether or not a negative screen of the urine for opiates was of significance and indicative that analysis of blood for opiates was not necessary. Specifically, we wished to determine whether a negative test for opiates by immunoassay absolutely rules out an acute overdose, and if not, what percentage of cases with negative results have opiates in the blood. A retrospective analysis was performed using the toxicology results for cases ruled an acute narcotic overdose at the Bexar County Medical Examiner's Office between 1998 and 2003. One hundred eighty-three cases met the criteria for the study. A false-negative rate of approximately 15% was found using an immunoassay as compared with blood analysis for narcotics. The authors feel that while this rate may be acceptable in a clinical setting, it is unacceptable in a forensic setting.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.paf.0000188089.10062.f4DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

forensic setting
8
opiates
5
reliability immunoassay
4
immunoassay determining
4
determining presence
4
presence opiates
4
opiates forensic
4
setting urine
4
urine immunoassays
4
immunoassays commonly
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!