Objective: The objective of this phantom study was to determine the performance of MDCT colonography for the detection of small polyps under ideal imaging conditions and to determine the added value of 3D imaging when used as an adjunct to 2D imaging.

Materials And Methods: Thirty-six polypoid and 39 flat polyps (44 lesions, 2-5 mm; 31 lesions, 6-8 mm) were placed in three explanted segments of a thoroughly cleaned porcine colon (overall length, 4.5 m) that was distended with air and submerged in a water phantom. MDCT data sets with 4 x 1 mm collimation and 6-mm table feed were reconstructed every 0.7 mm with 1.25-mm effective slice width. The data were reviewed by three radiologists using 2D images in all three projections and with 3D volume-rendered images available as an adjunct to the 2D images.

Results: Additional 3D as a problem-solving tool significantly increased the overall sensitivity (96% vs 90%), decreased the total number of false-positive calls (n = 9 vs n = 5), and increased the diagnostic confidence level (p < 0.03) compared with 2D images alone. Small polyps less than or equal to 5 mm (89% vs 95%, p = 0.004) and flat polyps (82% vs 94%, p = 0.001) especially benefited from 3D. Sensitivity was generally higher for polypoid than for flat polyps (99% vs 94%, p = 0.041).

Conclusion: Under phantom conditions, simulating an ideal clinical setup, MDCT colonography is not limited by spatial resolution and detects polyps less than or equal to 5 mm in size with high sensitivity and specificity. Additional 3D image tools improve diagnostic accuracy and reviewer confidence, especially for the detection of flat and small polyps.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.2214/AJR.04.1519DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

flat polyps
16
mdct colonography
12
small polyps
12
polyps
8
phantom study
8
polypoid flat
8
polyps equal
8
flat
5
detectability small
4
small flat
4

Similar Publications

Colonoscopy Remains an Important Option for Primary Screening for Colorectal Cancer.

Dig Dis Sci

December 2024

Division of Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

Article Synopsis
  • - Colonoscopy is the most commonly used screening test for colorectal cancer in the U.S., with high sensitivity for detecting precancerous lesions, allowing screenings every 10 years, and possibly every 15 years for those with normal results.
  • - There is substantial evidence showing colonoscopy reduces colorectal cancer incidence and mortality, supported by various studies, including comparisons with other screening methods like flexible sigmoidoscopy.
  • - Advances in colonoscopy techniques, such as improved mucosal exposure methods and non-device strategies, have enhanced detection rates of precancerous lesions, along with safer resection techniques for small lesions, increasing the effectiveness of this screening option.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

: Proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use has increased worldwide, including in continuous and longer-term users. Recent reports highlight PPI-related endoscopic gastric mucosal changes, including fundic gland polyps, hyperplastic polyps, multiple white and flat elevated lesions, cracked and cobblestone-like mucosa (CCLM), and black spots. PPI use elevates gastrin levels because of acid inhibition, and hypergastrinemia might be relevant to these findings.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a significant public health challenge. Patients having abnormal faecal immunochemical test (FIT) results are offered a colonoscopy. The effectiveness of colonoscopies can, however, often be challenged by the occurrence of missed polyps.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • - Rectal mucosal prolapse syndrome (RMPS) often presents with symptoms like rectal bleeding and can be mistaken for malignant rectal tumors (MRT) during endoscopic exams; this study aimed to differentiate between the two and examine RMPS characteristics.
  • - A total of 826 patients were analyzed, revealing that RMPS patients were younger, had smaller lesions, and a longer clinical course compared to those with MRT.
  • - Five distinct morphological phenotypes of RMPS lesions were identified, with gender differences noted in lesion types; key features like age, lesion size, and clinical duration can help differentiate RMPS from MRT.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Description: Nonampullary duodenal polyps are found in up to 5% of all upper endoscopies; the vast majority are identified incidentally in asymptomatic patients. Although most are benign, adenomas are estimated to account for 10%-20% of these lesions. Most international guidelines recommend that all duodenal adenomas should be considered for endoscopic resection; this may be associated with a near 15% adverse event rate (predominantly bleeding and perforation) in prospective studies, with substantial local recurrence on surveillance.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!