The anti-biowarfare anthrax and plague vaccines require repeated dosing to achieve adequate protection. To test the hypothesis that this limited immunogenicity results from the nature of vaccine interactions with the host innate immune system, we investigated molecular and cellular interactions between vaccines, dendritic cells (DCs), and T cells and explored the potential for adjuvants (pertussis) to boost induction of host immunity. Human monocyte-derived DCs were matured in the presence of vaccines and analyzed for their ability to induce Th1/Th2 development from naive T cells, expression of cell surface maturation/costimulation molecules, and cytokine production. The vaccines showed different behavior patterns. Although the plague vaccine is equivalent to control maturation factors in maturation and stimulation of DCs and induces strong MLR and Th outgrowth, the anthrax vaccine is a poor inducer of DC maturation, as indicated by low levels of HLA-DR, CD86, and CD83 induction and minimal proinflammatory cytokine production. Interestingly, however, anthrax vaccine-treated DCs stimulate Th1 and Th2 outgrowth and a limited MLR response. There was no sustained negative modulatory effects of the anthrax vaccine on DCs, and its limited stimulatory effects could be overridden by coculture with pertussis. These results were supported by analysis of anthrax vaccine recall responses in subjects vaccinated using pertussis as an adjuvant, who demonstrate anthrax-specific effector T cell responses. These data show that the anthrax vaccine is a suboptimal DC stimulus that may in part explain the observation that it requires repeated administration in vivo and offer a rational basis for the use of complementary DC-maturing adjuvants in combined immunotherapy.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.175.11.7235 | DOI Listing |
The anthrax pathogen can remain dormant as spores in soil for many years. This applies to both natural foci and to sites of anthropogenic activity such as tanneries, abattoirs, or wool factories. The A.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFVaccines (Basel)
January 2025
The GWI and HLA Research Groups, Brain Sciences Center, Department of Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN 55417, USA.
Background: Anthrax is a serious disease caused by () with a very high mortality when the spores of are inhaled (inhalational anthrax). Aerosolized spores can be used as a deadly bioweapon. Vaccination against anthrax is the only effective preventive measure and, hence, the anthrax vaccine was administered to United States (and other) troops during the 1990-91 Gulf War.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMicroorganisms
December 2024
Targeted Therapy Team, Institute for Cancer Research, 237 Fulham Road, London SW3 6JB, UK.
The COVID-19 and mpox crisis has reminded the world of the potentially catastrophic consequences of biological agents. Aside from the natural risk, biological agents can also be weaponized or used for bioterrorism. Dissemination in a population or among livestock could be used to destabilize a nation by creating a climate of terror, by negatively impacting the economy and undermining institutions.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPLoS Negl Trop Dis
December 2024
Emerging Pathogens Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America.
Bacillus cereus biovar anthracis (Bcbva) causes anthrax-like disease in animals, particularly in the non-human primates and great apes of West and Central Africa. Genomic analyses revealed Bcbva as a member of the B. cereus species that carries two plasmids, pBCXO1 and pBCXO2, which have high sequence homology to the B.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEpidemiol Infect
December 2024
Department of Wildlife, Animal Resources Management, College of Veterinary Medicine, Animal Resources and Biosecurity, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Anthrax is a bacterial zoonotic disease caused by We qualitatively examined facilitators and barriers to responding to a potential anthrax outbreak using the capability, opportunity, motivation behaviour model (COM-B model) in the high-risk rural district of Namisindwa, in Eastern Uganda. We chose the COM-B model because it provides a systematic approach for selecting evidence-based techniques and approaches for promoting the behavioural prompt response to anthrax outbreaks. Unpacking these facilitators and barriers enables the leaders and community members to understand existing resources and gaps so that they can leverage them for future anthrax outbreaks.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!