Giant ragweed specific immunotherapy is not effective in a proportion of patients sensitized to short ragweed: analysis of the allergenic differences between short and giant ragweed.

Background: Short ragweed and giant ragweed pollen allergens are considered largely cross-reactive, and it is generally believed that 1 species is sufficient for skin testing and immunotherapy. However, in the area north of Milan (a zone widely invaded only by short ragweed), about 50% of patients submitted to injection specific immunotherapy with giant ragweed showed little or no clinical response, but showed an excellent outcome if they were shifted to short ragweed specific immunotherapy.

Objective: To investigate allergenic differences between short and giant ragweed.

Methods: IgE reactivity to short ragweed of sera from 16 patients allergic to ragweed was assessed by immunoblot before and after absorption with short and giant ragweed. Moreover, 41 ragweed-monosensitive patients underwent skin prick test with both ragweed species.

Results: In several cases, preabsorption of sera with giant ragweed extract was unable to inhibit IgE reactivity fully against both a 43-kd allergen and other allergens at different molecular weights in short ragweed. On skin prick test, short ragweed induced larger wheals than giant ragweed in the majority of patients, and 6 of 41 (15%) patients were strongly short ragweed-positive but giant ragweed-negative. The immunoblot with the serum from 1 of these subjects showed a strong IgE reactivity to short ragweed at about 43 kd in the absence of any reactivity to giant ragweed.

Conclusion: Short and giant ragweed are not allergenically equivalent. Allergenic differences involve both the major allergens Amb a 1-2/Amb t 1-2 and some minor allergens. In patients allergic to ragweed, both diagnosis in vivo and immunotherapy should always be performed by using the ragweed species present in that specific geographic area.