The difference in threshold sensitivities that are found when examining the visual field (VF) with static versus kinetic perimetric methods is called stato-kinetic dissociation (SKD). In this pilot study, we describe a semi-automated procedure for quantifying SKD. Fifteen patients with VF defects were examined with kinetic and static perimetry. SKD values were defined as positive when the static scotoma was larger than the kinetic one. We found significant local variations of SKD along scotoma borders with the individual reaction time as an important criterion when determining kinetic thresholds. There was a verifiable SKD in all patients with locally negative values in eight subjects.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2005.08.026 | DOI Listing |
Vision Res
January 2006
University Eye Hospital Tuebingen, Department II, Schleichstrasse 12-16, D-72076 Tuebingen, Germany.
The difference in threshold sensitivities that are found when examining the visual field (VF) with static versus kinetic perimetric methods is called stato-kinetic dissociation (SKD). In this pilot study, we describe a semi-automated procedure for quantifying SKD. Fifteen patients with VF defects were examined with kinetic and static perimetry.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEur J Ophthalmol
March 1997
University Eye Clinic of Brescia, Italy.
Purpose: The aim of the study was to assess the presence and the importance of stato-kinetic dissociation (SKD) in subjects with normal and pathological visual fields (VF).
Methods: A "customized" perimetric test designed for the assessment of SKD was carried out in seven homogeneous samples of subjects (normal, glaucomatous, ocular hypertensive, retinopathic, cataract, anterior visual pathways neuropathic and posterior visual pathways neuropathic). The results were statistically compared (Anova).
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!