Purpose: To evaluate the advantages of multiplanar reconstruction and different axial slice thickness in diagnostic of rectal cancer recurrence after operation and radiotherapy.

Method: We included 83 patients after operation and radiotherapy of rectal cancer in this study. All patients got a minimum of three CT-examinations in their follow-up program. A total of 294 CT-scans were evaluated. Each examination was reviewed by two experienced radiologists in respect to recurrence. Each examination was presented in axial reconstruction with a slice sickness of 8, 5, and 1.25 mm and in multiplanar reconstruction. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and accuracy were calculated.

Results: Multiplanar reconstructions showed better results for the detection of recurrence than axial reconstruction. A reduced slice thickness did not lead to better results in axial reconstruction. Multiplanar reconstruction showed a sensitivity of 0.88, a specificity of 0.98, an accuracy of 0.96 and a positive predictive value of 0,94, for axial reconstruction we calculated: 0.82, 0.97, 0.94 and 0.88, respectively. Sensitivity and accuracy showed a significant increase after the first and second examination.

Conclusion: Multiplanar reconstructions allow a significant better detection of rectal cancer recurrence when compared to axial reconstructions. Thinner axial slice thickness shows no diagnostic advantage.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00117-003-0950-3DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

rectal cancer
16
axial reconstruction
16
cancer recurrence
12
multiplanar reconstruction
12
slice thickness
12
detection rectal
8
axial slice
8
thickness diagnostic
8
reconstruction sensitivity
8
positive predictive
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!