We report 2 cases of postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) elevation in secondary piggyback intraocular lens (IOL) implantation without history of glaucoma or ocular hypertension. A 74-year-old woman with myopic pseudophakia and a 68-year-old man with hyperopic pseudophakia received secondary piggyback AcrySof IOL implantation in their left eyes. In both patients, the left IOP gradually increased and sustained around 30 mm Hg for about 1 year. In the first, IOP continued elevating despite topical and systemic medications. There was an episode of pupillary block in the second. Gonioscopically, heavier trabecular meshwork pigmentation in their left eyes was observed. Because of this, the 2 IOLs implanted were removed and replaced by an adequate IOL and trabeculotomy was performed in the former. The AcrySof IOL has a truncated optic edge, which increases the risk for chafing the iris, resulting in pigment dispersion syndrome; thus, it would be a poor choice for a sulcus-placed piggyback implantation.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2005.06.034 | DOI Listing |
BMC Ophthalmol
December 2024
Shanghai Eye Diseases Prevention &Treatment Center, Shanghai Eye Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Background: Long-term hyperopia shift is a rare complication following cataract surgery, presenting significant clinical challenges in analysis and management.
Case Presentation: A 52-year-old female with a history of high myopia and laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) surgery presented with decreased vision in her left eye at the very fifth year after cataract surgery. The spherical equivalent in her left eye had increased to + 6.
Antibiotics (Basel)
September 2024
Department of Clinical and Administrative Pharmacy, University of Georgia College of Pharmacy, Athens, GA 30602, USA.
: Intravenous fluid shortages have led to fluid-sparing measures such as intravenous push (IVP) administration of antibiotics. This study aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of IVP and intravenous piggyback (IVPB) ceftriaxone in critically ill patients. : Demographics were similar in IVP ( = 201) and IVPB ( = 200) groups.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFGraefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol
September 2024
Department of Ophthalmology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Polypseudophakia, the concept of using a second intraocular lens (IOL) to supplement an IOL that has already been placed in the capsular bag, was first used as a corrective measure where the power requirement was higher than that of available single IOLs. Subsequently, the technique was modified to compensate for post-operative residual refractive errors. In these early cases, an IOL designed for the capsular bag would be implanted in the sulcus.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEpilepsia
October 2024
Department of Pharmacy, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Objective: Intravenous (IV) push (IVP) is an alternative administration method for levetiracetam, but evidence evaluating it compared to IV piggyback (IVPB) for loading doses in acutely seizing patients is limited, particularly in patients with status epilepticus (SE). This study aimed to compare the efficiency and safety of IVP versus IVPB levetiracetam loading doses.
Methods: This was a single-center sequential retrospective study conducted in adult (≥18 years) patients who received an IV levetiracetam loading dose (>2000 mg or ≥20 mg/kg) for acute or suspected seizure.
Am J Health Syst Pharm
November 2024
Department of Pharmacy, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Purpose: Intravenous administration of the antiseizure medication lacosamide can be delayed given operational challenges related to short beyond-use-dating and controlled substance requirements. The purpose of this study was to describe the steps required to successfully transition from intravenous piggyback administration to intravenous push administration and demonstrate that workflow changes improved time to administration without compromising patient safety.
Methods: This multicenter study had 2 components; the first portion was a prospective description of the implementation and operationalization process, while the second was a retrospective cohort analysis comparing patients who received intravenous piggyback and intravenous push lacosamide.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!