A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

RAR-beta(1) overexpression in chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: a novel target for therapeutic intervention? | LitMetric

Aim: Retinoic acid (RA) has proven to possess modest but distinct activity in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC), at least in a subgroup of patients. However, the exact molecular mechanisms leading to success or failure of RA application in individual patients are still unknown. As earlier studies have indicated that in RCC the RA receptor (RAR) beta might play a central role in RA signaling, we investigated the expression of the isoforms RAR-beta(1+2) in primary conventional and chromophobe RCC.

Methods: We used quantitative RT-PCR methodology to study RAR-beta(1) and RAR-beta(2) expression in ten primary conventional RCC samples (clear cell type), in two chromophobe RCC specimens, and the respective corresponding normal kidney tissues. The housekeeping genes RPS9 and RPLP0 were applied to normalize differences in mRNA quality and quantity.

Results: In contrast to conventional RCC samples, RAR-beta(1) was significantly overexpressed in both chromophobe tumors compared to the adjacent normal kidney tissue (p=0.03). On the contrary, RAR-beta(2) expression did neither differ significantly between conventional and chromophobe RCC (p=0.91) nor between malignant and normal kidney tissue (p>or=0.47).

Conclusion: We demonstrate for the first time a significant and specific overexpression of RAR-beta(1) in chromophobe RCC. In future we will have to confirm this result within a larger number of samples.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

chromophobe rcc
12
normal kidney
12
renal cell
8
cell carcinoma
8
primary conventional
8
conventional chromophobe
8
rar-beta2 expression
8
conventional rcc
8
rcc samples
8
kidney tissue
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!