The purpose of this study was to compare the a-waves of mGluR6-deficient mice (KO) to that of wild-type mice (WT), and to determine whether the light-adapted electroretinogram of the KO mice originate exclusively from cones. Dark-adapted a-waves were recorded under the same conditions from both types of mice. With a 96-cd/m(2) background, the a-wave from both types of mice showed a rapid recovery over a 50-min period. The analysis of the a-waves in KO mice indicated that the recovery was determined mainly by the rod component. The light-adapted b-wave of WT mice showed no corresponding recovery. We conclude that rod contribution must be considered in the analyses of the light-adapted a-waves of KO mice.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2005.09.007DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

mice
9
mglur6-deficient mice
8
types mice
8
a-waves mice
8
recovery
4
recovery rod-mediated
4
rod-mediated a-wave
4
a-wave light-adaptation
4
light-adaptation mglur6-deficient
4
mice purpose
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!