Purpose: To retrospectively determine the lesion miss rate and false-negative rate of needle-localized open breast biopsy (NLOBB) with stereotactic guidance in a large study population.
Materials And Methods: The ethical review board approved the study; the need for informed consent was waived. A total of 1115 stereotactic NLOBBs performed in 1068 women aged 22-90 years (mean age, 54 years) were tracked to determine outcomes. In cases of malignancy, NLOBB was considered to be diagnostically successful. The mammographic outcomes in all patients with benign results at NLOBB were tracked for at least 2 years. Cases without such mammographic follow-up were cross-referenced with a tumor registry after at least 54 months. The lesion miss rate was based on all malignant lesions and all lesions with long-term mammographic follow-up. Results from all 1115 NLOBBs were used to report the false-negative rate.
Results: Of 1115 NLOBBs, 472 (42%) had malignant results. Mammographic follow-up data were available for 535 (83%) of 643 NLOBBs with benign results. Mammographic follow-up revealed 11 lesions that were missed with NLOBB, of which five were malignant and six benign. Thus, the lesion miss rate with NLOBB was 1.1% (11/[472 + 535]). Among the 643 cases, in 108 of them without mammographic follow-up (17%), cross-referencing with a tumor registry did not reveal missed cases of breast carcinoma. The false-negative rate was therefore 1.0% (5/[472 + 5]).
Conclusion: On the basis of the results of long-term follow-up, the authors noted a lesion miss rate of 1.1% and a false-negative rate of 1.0%, which indicate that NLOBB with stereotactic guidance is an accurate method for diagnosing breast lesions.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2373041391 | DOI Listing |
JAMA Netw Open
January 2025
Institute of Medical Science, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Importance: Secondary lymphedema is a common, harmful side effect of breast cancer treatment. Robust risk models that are externally validated are needed to facilitate clinical translation. A published risk model used 5 accessible clinical factors to predict the development of breast cancer-related lymphedema; this model included a patient's mammographic breast density as a novel predictive factor.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFRadiol Artif Intell
January 2025
Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce St, Philadelphia, PA 19104.
Purpose To evaluate the change in DBT-AI (digital breast tomosynthesis-artificial intelligence) case scores over sequential screens. Materials and Methods This retrospective review included 21,108 female patients (mean age, 58.1 ± [SD] 11.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEur J Radiol Open
June 2025
Radiology Department, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Egypt.
Purpose: To investigate the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) reading digital mammograms in increasing the chance of detecting missed breast cancer, by studying the AI- flagged early morphology indictors, overlooked by the radiologist, and correlating them with the missed cancer pathology types.
Methods And Materials: Mammograms done in 2020-2023, presenting breast carcinomas (n = 1998), were analyzed in concordance with the prior one year's result (2019-2022) assumed negative or benign. Present mammograms reviewed for the descriptors: asymmetry, distortion, mass, and microcalcifications.
Aust J Rural Health
February 2025
Department of General Surgery, Taranaki Base Hospital, Health New Zealand-Taranaki, New Plymouth, New Zealand.
Objective: New Zealand and international guidelines recommend surveillance mammography in breast cancer survivors. Ethnic breast cancer-specific diagnosis, treatment and survival inequities exist in Aotearoa New Zealand. Surveillance mammography uptake remains poorly studied internationally and has never been studied in AoNZ.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAnn Surg Oncol
December 2024
Laboratory of Pathology Dordrecht, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
Background: The Dutch breast cancer guideline recommends surveillance for classic lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS), unless there is a discrepancy with mammographic findings, and surgery for pleomorphic and non-classic LCIS.
Objective: The aim of this study was to assess adherence to the guideline in daily practice, as well as the surgery rate, risk of upstaging, and events during follow-up.
Methods: Selection of patients from a nationwide cohort diagnosed between 2011 and 2020.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!