Unlabelled: There are a lot of in vitro and also in vivo studies under strictly restricted and subject-demanding laboratory conditions using X-ray or MRI recordings, but very few studies give information about the lumbar spine intersegmental behavior in daily life activities. Aims of this study were to measure the intersegmental lumbar spine motions during lifting trials and to determine the different motion patterns of different subjects performing comparable lifting tasks. First, 11 healthy volunteers had to perform lifting tasks (box weight 4-15 kg) using their favorite lifting technique (no instructions by the researcher). The coordinates of skin-markers attached on lumbar spines of the subjects were measured using 3D-motion capturing and then transformed to Cardan-angles. Second, 23 volunteers performed lifting tasks (box weight 4-15 kg) with the instruction to bend their knees during lifting. Coordinates of this smaller set of markers on lumbar spines of the subjects were transformed to intersegmental angles using a spline-method. From the first experiment three groups of motion patterns are distinguishable: subjects who used only small intersegmental range of motion within their upper lumbar spine and bended their knees during lifting were in contrast to subjects who used 3.25 times wider range of motion in the upper lumbar spine and did not bend the knees (cluster analysis, c = 0.76). The third group was not assignable to these other two groups. Within all lifting trials of the second experiment different groups were detectable also: in spite of all subjects bended their knees, there were subjects with wide range of motion of lumbar spine motion segments. Other subjects were able to reduce intersegmental range of motion (k-means clustering, msv > 0.47). From this it follows that the intersegmental motion of lumbar spine is individually different and not equal for all lumbar levels. Furthermore, lifting technique influenced the motion of the lumbar spine. But not for all subjects, the advice to bend the knees during the lifting effectively reduced the lumbar motion ranges.
In Conclusion: special instructions to reduce lumbar spinal motion are recommended. Due to different lumbar spine motion patterns, different loading situations are anticipated because of changing lever arms and angular accelerations. This understanding is important in reducing spinal loading and to prevent spinal disorders in manual material handling tasks.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pathophys.2005.09.003 | DOI Listing |
Neurosurg Rev
January 2025
Nanjing TCM Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 157 Daming Road, Nanjing, Qinhuai District, 210022, China.
To systematically evaluate the differences in the clinical efficacy of lumbar degenerative disorders (LDDs) treatment between oblique lumbar interbody fusion with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (OLIF-PF), OLIF stand-alone (OLIF-SA), and OLIF with anterolateral screw fixation (OLIF-AF). A systematic search was conducted on both English and Chinese databases, wherein the literature was screened based on title, abstract, and full text. Literature that met the inclusion criteria was assessed for quality and relevant information was extracted.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEur Spine J
January 2025
Department of Neurosurgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Purpose: Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a frequently occurring condition defined by narrowing of the spinal or nerve root canal due to degenerative changes. Physicians use MRI scans to determine the severity of stenosis, occasionally complementing it with X-ray or CT scans during the diagnostic work-up. However, manual grading of stenosis is time-consuming and induces inter-reader variability as a standardized grading system is lacking.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFGlobal Spine J
January 2025
Department of Science, Research and Education, BG Klinikum Bergmannstrost Halle, Halle, Germany.
Study Design: Multicenter, prospective observational cohort study.
Objectives: 109 patients with lumbar spine stenosis (LSS) undergoing minimally invasive decompression in 6 different centers (Germany, Italy, USA).
Methods: The demographic, surgical and clinical data was collected.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
January 2025
Department of Orthopedics, Brown University, Providence, RI.
Study Design: Retrospective cohort study.
Objective: Evaluate the utility of Delirium Risk Assessment Score (DRAS), Delirium Risk Assessment Tool (DRAT), and Delirium Elderly At-Risk (DEAR) in patients undergoing posterior lumbar interbody fusions.
Background: Surgical interventions can place patients at risk for postoperative delirium (POD), an acute and often severe cognitive impairment associated with poor outcomes.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
January 2025
Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Study Design: Prospective cohort study.
Objective: This study aims to define Substantial Clinical Benefit (SCB) thresholds for PROMIS physical function (PF) and pain interference (PI) in lumbar or thoracolumbar spine surgery population.
Summary Of Background Data: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are widely used in spine surgery to assess treatment efficacy.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!