A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

[Influences of enteral nutrition combined with probiotics on the gut microecology and barrier function of the rats with abdominal infection]. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to assess how enteral nutrition (EN), parenteral nutrition (PN), and probiotics affect the gut microecology and barrier function in rats with abdominal infections.
  • Rats were divided into three groups receiving different combinations of PN, EN, and probiotics, and were analyzed for gut bacteria, immunological markers, and overall gut health after six days.
  • Results showed that combining EN with probiotics improved gut health by increasing beneficial bacteria and enhancing gut barrier function compared to PN alone, suggesting a potential therapeutic benefit of this combined approach.

Article Abstract

Objective: To investigate the influences of enteral nutrition (EN), parenteral nutrition (PN) and probiotics supplement on the intestinal microecology, and barrier function of the rats with abdominal infection.

Methods: Twenty-one Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats with abdominal infection were randomly divided into three groups, and received PN (PN group, n=7), PN+ EN (PN+ EN group, n=7) or PN+ EN+ probiotics (probiotics group, n=7) respectively with isonitrogen and isocaloric nutrition. The rats were sacrificed after six days. The feces in cecum were cultured for anaerobic bacterial growth and DNA fingerprint spectrum was analyzed by randomly amplified polymorphic DNA technique. The transmembrane binding protein (occludin) and IgA levels in colon and terminal ileum were detected by immunohistochemistry method. The bacterial translocation rate and endotoxin level were also measured.

Results: The germ numbers of different species were both higher in PN+ EN and probiotic group than those in PN group. The bands of DNA fingerprint spectrum were significantly decreased in PN group, but the bands in both PN+ EN group and probiotic group were similar to that in the normal rats. The expression levels of occludin and IgA in the intestine and colorectum were higher in both PN+ EN group and probiotic group compared with those of PN group (P< 0.05, P< 0.01, respectively), the expression level of occludin was higher in probiotic group than that in PN+ EN group (P< 0.05). The overall bacterial translocation rates and endotoxin levels were significantly reduced in both probiotic and PN+ EN group (P< 0.05), but there was no difference between probiotic group and EN group.

Conclusion: EN combined with probiotics can increase occluding and IgA expressions, improve the intestinal microecology,maintain the gut barrier function, and decrease the incidence of gut bacterial translocation.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

pn+ group
20
probiotic group
20
group
15
barrier function
12
rats abdominal
12
group n=7
12
bacterial translocation
12
group 005
12
enteral nutrition
8
combined probiotics
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!