AI Article Synopsis

Article Abstract

Background: By accounting for level of comorbidity, risk-adjustment models should quantify the risk of death. How accurately comorbidity indices predict risk of death in Medicare beneficiaries with atrial fibrillation is unclear.

Objectives: We sought to quantify how well 3 administrative-data based comorbidity indices (Deyo, Romano, and Elixhauser) predict mortality compared with a chart-review index.

Design: We undertook a retrospective cohort study using Medicare claim data (1995-1999) and medical record review.

Subjects: We studied Medicare beneficiaries (n = 2728; mean age = 77) with a common cardiac dysrhythmia, atrial fibrillation.

Measures: The outcome was time to death with the accuracy of the comorbidity indices measured by the c-statistic.

Results: Correlation between Deyo and Romano indices was strong, but weak between them and the other indices. Prevalence of many comorbidity conditions varied with different indices. Compared with demographic data alone (c = 0.64), all comorbidity indices predicted death significantly (P < 0.001) better: the c index was 0.76 for Deyo, 0.78 for Romano, 0.76 for Elixhauser, and 0.75 for medical record review. The 95% confidence intervals of the c-statistic for the 4 indices overlapped with one another. Key comorbidity conditions for death included metastatic cancer, neuropsychiatric disease, heart failure, and liver disease.

Conclusion: The predictive accuracy of 3 administrative-data based indices was similar and comparable with chart-review.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.mlr.0000182477.29129.86DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

comorbidity indices
20
indices
9
comorbidity
8
indices predict
8
predict mortality
8
atrial fibrillation
8
risk death
8
medicare beneficiaries
8
administrative-data based
8
deyo romano
8

Similar Publications

Background: Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) has recently been used to predict adverse health outcomes including length of stay (LOS) in hospital. LOS is an important indicator for patient quality of care, the measurement of hospital performance, efficiency and costs. Tools to predict LOS may enable earlier interventions in those identified at higher risk of a long stay.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: This study aimed to validate the American College of Surgeons (ACS) National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) risk calculator for predicting outcomes in patients undergoing abdominoplasty after massive weight loss.

Methods: Patients' characteristics, pre-existing comorbidities and adverse outcomes in our department from 2013 to 2023 were collected retrospectively. Adverse events were defined according to ACS-NSQIP standards and predicted risks were calculated manually using the ACS-NSQIP risk calculator.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer in women in the U.S. and a leading cause of cancer-related deaths.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Methods: We examined a quality measurement database containing de-identified cases from across Switzerland. All patients with a complete dataset treated between 2015 and 2021 were included. A case-control matching method (same age, comorbidity, sex, diagnosis, admission type, and insurance coverage) was used to evaluate the impact of pre-admission residence.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!