Objective: To provide further evidence for the efficacy and safety of drotrecogin alfa (activated) treatment in severe sepsis.

Design: Single-arm, open-label, trial of drotrecogin alfa (activated) treatment in severe sepsis patients. Enrollment began in March 2001 and day-28 follow-up completed in January 2003.

Setting: ENHANCE took place in 25 countries at 361 sites.

Patients: Patients with known or suspected infection, three or four systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria, and one or more sepsis-induced organ dysfunctions. Of 2,434 adults entered, 2,378 received drotrecogin alfa (activated), and of these, 2,375 completed the protocol.

Interventions: Drotrecogin alfa (activated) was infused at a dose of 24 mug/kg/hr for 96 hrs.

Measurements And Main Results: The 28-day all-cause mortality approximated that observed in PROWESS (25.3% vs. 24.7%). Although patients in ENHANCE had increased serious bleeding rates compared with patients in the drotrecogin alfa (activated) arm of PROWESS (during infusion, 3.6% vs. 2.4%; postinfusion, 3.2% vs. 1.2%; 28-day, 6.5% vs. 3.5%), increased postinfusion bleeding suggested a higher background bleeding rate. Intracranial hemorrhage was more common in ENHANCE than PROWESS (during infusion, 0.6% vs. 0.2%; 28-day, 1.5% vs. 0.2%). The incidence of fatal intracranial hemorrhage was the same during infusion (0.2%) and higher at 28 days (0.5% vs. 0.2%). ENHANCE patients treated within 0-24 hrs from their first sepsis-induced organ dysfunction had lower observed mortality rate than those treated after 24 hrs (22.9% vs. 27.4%, p = .01).

Conclusions: ENHANCE provides supportive evidence for the favorable benefit/risk ratio observed in PROWESS and suggests that more effective use of drotrecogin alfa (activated) might be obtained by initiating therapy earlier.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.ccm.0000181729.46010.83DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

drotrecogin alfa
28
alfa activated
28
activated treatment
12
treatment severe
12
severe sepsis
8
open-label trial
8
sepsis-induced organ
8
observed prowess
8
prowess infusion
8
intracranial hemorrhage
8

Similar Publications

Hydrocortisone plus fludrocortisone for community acquired pneumonia-related septic shock: a subgroup analysis of the APROCCHSS phase 3 randomised trial.

Lancet Respir Med

May 2024

Department of Intensive Care, Raymond Poincaré Hospital, APHP University Versailles Saint Quentin-University Paris Saclay, Garches, France; Institut Hospitalo Universitaire PROMETHEUS, Garches, France; Laboratory of Infection & Inflammation-U1173, School of Medicine, INSERM, University Versailles Saint Quentin-University Paris Saclay, Garches, France; FHU SEPSIS, Garches, France. Electronic address:

Article Synopsis
  • The study explores the effectiveness of hydrocortisone and fludrocortisone treatments in patients with septic shock caused by community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) compared to non-CAP cases.
  • It includes data from the phase 3 APROCCHSS trial, which initially tested these treatments across multiple centers in France, focusing specifically on how they impact mortality outcomes.
  • Results indicate that patients with CAP may respond differently to these treatments, and various mortality rates and recovery metrics were analyzed to determine the overall benefit of the steroid regimen.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Septic cardiomyopathy increases mortality by 70% to 90% and results in mechanical dysfunction of cells.

Methods: Here, we created a LPS-induced in-vitro sepsis model with mouse embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (mESC-CM) using the CellDrum technology which simultaneously measures mechanical compliance and beat frequency of mESCs. Visualization of reactive oxygen species (ROS), actin stress fibers, and mRNA quantification of endothelial protein C receptor (EPCR) and protease-activated receptor 1 (PAR1) before/after LPS incubation were used for method validation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Old drug, new Trick? The rationale for the treatment of COVID-19 with activated protein C.

Med Hypotheses

April 2021

Tufts University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Newton-Wellesley Hospital, 2014 Washington Street, Newton, MA 02462, USA. Electronic address:

As the COVID-19 pandemic continues, researchers seek to identify efficacious treatments. Current approaches to COVID-19 therapeutics focus on antiviral agents, convalescent plasma, monoclonal antibodies, immunomodulators and more traditional therapies such as steroids [1-6]. Reversing disturbances in coagulation has also been identified as a priority area for candidate therapies, such as through the Accelerating COVID-19 Therapeutic Interventions and Vaccines 4 adaptive clinical trial (ACTIV-4) which is currently evaluating aspirin, heparins and apixaban [7].

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Sepsis is a global health priority. Interventions to reduce the burden of sepsis need to be both effective and cost-effective. We performed a systematic review of the literature on health economic evaluations of sepsis treatments in critically ill adult patients and summarised the evidence for cost-effectiveness.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Sepsis can be defined as a life-threatening organ dysfunction due to a dysregulated host response to infection. In sepsis, the coagulation cascade is activated and the balance shifts to the procoagulant side. Recently, the use of protein C is proposed for the treatment of sepsis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!