Influence of tissue fixation on the microextraction and identification of amyloid proteins.

In surgical pathology, correct immunohistochemical identification of AL amyloidosis poses a particular problem. Immunostaining for lambda- or kappa-light chains is commonly encountered even in non-immunoglobulin-derived amyloidoses, which leads to a false-positive classification as AL amyloidosis. In this respect, microextraction of amyloid proteins from surgical pathology specimens and their subsequent biochemical characterization may prove useful in reaching the correct diagnosis. In this study, we investigated systematically the influence of fixation on the extraction of amyloid proteins from amyloid-containing tissue samples. Tissue samples were obtained from a patient with generalized AA amyloidosis and from a second patient with generalized AL amyloidosis. The samples were stored either unfixed or fixed in phosphate buffered 4% p-formaldehyde, methacarn, or Bouin for 3 days, 1 week, or 1 month. Thereafter, proteins were extracted according to the procedure of Layfield et al, separated by SDS-PAGE and subjected to Western blotting, using antibodies directed against AA amyloid and immunoglobulin-derived lambda-light chain. Following this procedure, a variety of differently sized AA amyloid or lambda-light chain immunoreactive protein bands were found in both patients, which is typical for amyloid proteins. Fixation time did not per se prohibit the extraction of these amyloid proteins from tissue samples, which remained detectable irrespective of fixation time. Although all three fixatives impaired the resolution of some, but not all, individual amyloid proteins, this procedure may help to confirm or reject a diagnosis of AL amyloidosis, because detection of several lambda- or kappa-light chain immunoreactive protein bands in the low-molecular-weight range (<20 kDa) is a common characteristic of their amyloid nature.