Laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy has decreased the disincentives to live renal donation with a risk of complications similar to that of open donor nephrectomy. We report a patient who developed chylous ascites after an otherwise-uneventful laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. On MEDLINE search, we could find only two other cases with similar complications. This condition has the potential to cause significant morbidity in the donor, which may reduce the advantages of the minimally invasive approach. We suggest that meticulous dissection of the renal hilum and clipping of lymphatic tissue around the renal vessels could prevent this untoward complication.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/end.2005.19.839 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Association between intraoperative fluid management and postoperative outcomes in living kidney donors: a retrospective cohort study.
Sci Rep
January 2025
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81, Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea.
Optimal fluid strategy for laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) remains unclear. LDN has been a domain for liberal fluid management to ensure graft perfusion, but this can result in adverse outcomes due to fluid overload. We compared postoperative outcome of living kidney donors according to the intraoperative fluid management.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFIntroduction: Living-donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) is often performed using hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (HALDN). Adherent perinephric fat (APF) can complicate HALDN, increasing operative time. The Mayo Adhesive Probability (MAP) score predicts APF preoperatively.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThe Impact of Learning Curve on Robotic Living Donor Nephrectomy Outcomes: Retrospective Analysis.
Int J Med Robot
February 2025
Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York, USA.
Background: We aimed to investigate the outcome of patients after RDN at different time points.
Methods: We studied the outcomes of 77 living robotic living donor nephrectomies (RDN). Donors were separated into three groups: learning curve period (LCP), stabilisation period (SP), and teaching period (TP).
YAU kidney transplantation spotlight: should the robotic surgery be considered the "standard of care" for living donor nephrectomy?
Minerva Urol Nephrol
December 2024
Unit of Uro-Oncology and Kidney Transplant, Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
The utility of split function testing in determining recovery of glomerular filtration rate after living kidney donation: a cohort study.
BMC Nephrol
January 2025
Glasgow Renal & Transplant Unit, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, 1345 Govan Road, Glasgow, G51 4TF, Scotland.
Background: A number of UK transplantation centres use isotope studies to estimate the relative contribution from each kidney in living kidney donor assessment. The evidence that the estimation of pre-donation split function of the non-donated kidney influences post-donation renal recovery is limited. The aim of this study was to analyse whether, in the context of other donor factors, the split function of the non-donated kidney predicts the percentage recovery of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) at one-year post-donation.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!