A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

In vitro comparison of the charge-injection limits of activated iridium oxide (AIROF) and platinum-iridium microelectrodes. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study compares the charge-injection limits of activated iridium oxide electrodes (AIROF) and PtIr microelectrodes of similar size and shape.
  • At bias potentials ranging from 0.1 to 0.7 V and frequencies of 20, 50, and 100 Hz, AIROF electrodes demonstrated superior performance, injecting significantly more charge than PtIr.
  • Specifically, AIROF could inject 4 to 10 times more charge, reaching a maximum of 3.9 mC/cm² at 0.7 V and 20 Hz frequency.

Article Abstract

The charge-injection limits of activated iridium oxide electrodes (AIROF) and PtIr microelectrodes with similar geometric area and shape have been compared in vitro using a stimulation waveform that delivers cathodal current pulses with current-limited control of the electrode bias potential in the interpulse period. Charge-injection limits were compared over a bias range of 0.1-0.7 V (versus Ag/AgCl) and pulse frequencies of 20, 50, and 100 Hz. The AIROF was capable of injecting between 4 and 10 times the charge of the PtIr electrode, with a maximum value of 3.9 mC/cm2 obtained at a 0.7 V bias and 20 Hz frequency.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2005.851503DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

charge-injection limits
12
limits activated
8
activated iridium
8
iridium oxide
8
vitro comparison
4
comparison charge-injection
4
oxide airof
4
airof platinum-iridium
4
platinum-iridium microelectrodes
4
microelectrodes charge-injection
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!