Introduction: The reduction of defibrillation threshold (DFT) in patients treated with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator increases patients' safety and prolongs ICD battery life.

Aim: To evaluate the possibility of reducing the defibrillation threshold in ICDs with an active can and an additional atrial defibrillation coil instead of the typical intracardiac single-coil lead.

Method: This study involved 138 patients (36 F and 102 M, mean age 54+/-15 years) including 62 subjects with dual-coil defibrillation lead (group A) and 76 ones with single-coil defibrillation lead (group B). No statistically significant differences with respect to age, left ventricular function, main disease or exacerbation of heart failure according to the NYHA functional class were observed between groups. The defibrillation threshold was measured using the DFT+ protocol.

Results: No significant differences between groups were identified with respect to pacing and sensing parameters. The comparison of DFT values between the two studied groups revealed significant improvement (by 14% mean) of defibrillation efficacy in group A. In group A, the mean DFT was 9.8+/-4.6 J (3-20 J) and mean defibrillation resistance - 45+/-7 W (32-73 W), whereas in group B: 11.45+/-5.25 J (3-28 J) and 72+/-12.8 W (38-106 W), respectively. In 93% of patients from group A, DFT was below 15 J, in comparison to 81% of patients from group B (p=0.046). The odds ratio of a higher defibrillation threshold (ł15 J) in group A vs. group B was 0.3 (95% confidence interval: 0.09-0.98). The DFT reduction associated with modified ICD system use was independent of following clinical parameters: patient age, gender, main disease, end-diastolic left ventricular diameter, left ventricular ejection fraction, NYHA functional class and concomitant treatment with antiarrhythmic agents.

Conclusions: Modification of the electric field during defibrillation, achieved with the use of active-can ICDs with dual-coil defibrillation leads, allows a reduction of DFT by 14%. At the same time, it reduces the risk of a higher (> or =15 J) DFT by three times compared to patients with a standard single-coil defibrillation lead.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

defibrillation threshold
16
defibrillation
13
dual-coil defibrillation
12
defibrillation lead
12
left ventricular
12
group
9
defibrillation efficacy
8
implantable cardioverter-defibrillator
8
defibrillation leads
8
lead group
8

Similar Publications

Background: Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are essential for reducing sudden cardiac death in patients at risk of ventricular arrhythmias. The choice of ICD lead - single-coil or dual-coil - can influence device performance and patient outcomes. This meta-analysis evaluates the comparative efficacy and safety of single-coil versus dual-coil ICD leads to inform clinical decision-making.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 35% are at increased risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD) within the first months after a myocardial infarction (MI). The wearable cardioverter defibrillator (WCD) is an established, safe and effective solution which can protect patients from SCD during the first months after an MI, when the risk of SCD is at its peak. This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of WCD combined with guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) compared to GDMT alone, after MI in the English National Health Service (NHS).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Increasing life expectancy and advances in cancer treatment will lead to more patients needing both radiation therapy (RT) and cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). CIEDs, including pacemakers and defibrillators, are essential for managing cardiac arrhythmias and heart failure. Telemetric monitoring of CIEDs checks battery status, lead function, settings, and diagnostic data, thereby identifying software deviations or damage.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: In arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (ACM), left ventricle-dominant presentation has poorer outcomes than right-dominant presentation, suggesting that interventricular functional disparity might play a role in patients' prognosis. However, the prognostic impact of ventricular functional discordance in ACM patients remains unknown.

Purpose: To assess whether ventricular functional disparity measured as ventricular discordance index, defined as the ratio of right-ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF) to left-ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), might reveal prognostic disparities between phenotypes and offer added risk stratification value.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Noninferiority of omitting intraoperative defibrillation threshold (DFT) testing has been documented for transvenous implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) whereas data for the subcutaneous-ICD (S-ICD) regarding the need for DFT testing, especially during S-ICD generator replacement, is not available.

Methods: A total of 112 consecutive patients who underwent S-ICD generator replacement and routine testing were included in this retrospective single-center study and analyzed regarding the outcome of intraoperative DFT.

Results: The majority of patients (87.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!