Pulse-spray pharmacomechanical thrombolysis for proximal deep vein thrombosis.

Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg

First Department (Cardiovascular Division) of Internal Medicine, Mie University School of Medicine, Tsu, Mie, Japan.

Published: February 2006

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and feasibility of pulse-spray pharmacomechanical thrombolysis to treat proximal deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in conjunction with the placement of a non-permanent IVC filter.

Methods: We studied 31 consecutive patients with acute proximal DVT defined as the inferior vena cava (IVC), iliac vein and/or femoral vein, who were diagnosed using duplex ultrasonography and/or contrast venography. All were treated with pulse-spray urokinase. Early success was assessed by comparing the pre- and post-treatment venographic severity score. Non-permanent IVC filters were used to reduce the risk of pulmonary thromboembolism.

Results: The average total urokinase dose was 1.71 million IU (range: 0.72-3.6 million IU) and the average duration of therapy was 2.4 days. The average percentage of thrombus lysed was 85% (range: 22-100%). A large thrombus trapped by the filter was detected using cavography before extraction of the filter in one patient. There was no major treatment-related adverse event.

Conclusion: The combination of pulse-spray pharmacomechanical thrombolysis and the prophylactic use of a non-permanent IVC filter was a safe and effective approach for treating acute proximal DVT.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2005.08.010DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

pulse-spray pharmacomechanical
12
pharmacomechanical thrombolysis
12
non-permanent ivc
12
proximal deep
8
deep vein
8
vein thrombosis
8
acute proximal
8
proximal dvt
8
pulse-spray
4
proximal
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!