A prospective study was performed to compare a rapid immunochromogenic cassette test (ICT) with the indirect haemagglutination assay (IHA) and clinical rules for the diagnosis of melioidosis in an endemic area. The sensitivity and specificity of the IgG ICT was 86% and 47%, and the IgM ICT was 82% and 47%, respectively. These were similar to the results for IHA (sensitivity 73%, specificity 64%) and clinical rules (73% and 37%). ICT lacks clinical utility as a result of high background rates of positive Burkholderia pseudomallei serology in this population. Low sensitivity and specificity of clinical rules is consistent with the protean manifestations of melioidosis and clinical difficulty in identifying patients with melioidosis.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trstmh.2005.04.019DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

clinical rules
12
rapid immunochromogenic
8
immunochromogenic cassette
8
cassette test
8
diagnosis melioidosis
8
sensitivity specificity
8
clinical
5
prospective evaluation
4
evaluation rapid
4
test diagnosis
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!