Aim: To establish the likelihood of, and risk factors associated with, progression of 'macula-on' retinal detachment.
Methods: A multi-centre prospective observational study of patients with acute retinal detachment, not involving the fovea, was conducted over a 6-month period. Data collected included duration of symptoms, visual acuity, presence of posterior vitreous detachment, retinal drawings and subretinal fluid (SRF) distance from the fovea at a minimum of two time points.
Results: A total of 82 data sets from 15 institutions were analysed. Of 82 cases 11 (13%) demonstrated progression of fluid. Mean progression in those cases which progressed was 2.3 disc diameters (dd) and the average rate of progression was 1.80 dd/day. Binary regression analysis failed to reveal any statistically significant risk factors for progression. Multiple regression analyses were made to identify risk factors. With distance of SRF from fovea at operation as a function, distance of SRF at presentation was the only statistically significant risk factor. In all, 26% of patients underwent surgery out-of-hours. A total of 83% patients achieved a 6-week best-corrected vision of 6/9 or better.
Conclusion: Most retinal detachments in this study did not progress within the first few days. The distance of SRF from the fovea at presentation was the only statistically significant risk factor for progression to foveal detachment.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.eye.6702083 | DOI Listing |
JAMA Netw Open
January 2025
Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute Landmark Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Introduction: Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) is increasingly used for obesity and metabolic disease, with safety profiles showing it is among the safest major operations. The last 20 + years have noted significantly improved safety that has been accompanied by decreasing length of stay and select populations electing for outpatient surgery, leading to continued decreases in cost. Regardless, readmissions and complications still occur, requiring inpatient postoperative care (IP-POC).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAIDS Behav
January 2025
Medical Research Council/Uganda Virus Research Institute and London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (MRC/UVRI & LSHTM) Uganda Research Unit, Kampala, Uganda.
Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has proven to be a powerful tool in preventing HIV infection. There is limited information about the factors associated with willingness to use different PrEP modalities among adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) in Africa. We assessed willingness to use long-acting injectable PrEP (LAI-PrEP) among 14-24-year-old AGYW at high risk of HIV in Uganda, and associated factors determined using multivariable complementary log-log regression.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAIDS Behav
January 2025
Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Rd. NE Atlanta GA, Atlanta, 30322, USA.
This study aimed to explore the awareness, willingness, and engagement with pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among high-risk Chinese men who have sex with men (MSM) and to investigate the factors influencing its use. A cross-sectional survey of 1800 HIV-negative MSM was conducted in Chengdu, Suzhou, and Wuhan between June 2022 and February 2023 through in-person and online recruitment methods. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify predictors of PrEP use.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAdv Biotechnol (Singap)
January 2025
National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
The co-circulation of influenza and SARS-CoV-2 has led to co-infection events, primarily affecting children and older adults, who are at higher risk for severe disease. Although co-infection prevalence is relatively low, it is associated with worse outcomes compared to mono-infections. Previous studies have shown that the outcomes of co-infection depend on multiple factors, including viral interference, virus-host interaction and host response.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!