Epidemiology and costs of diabetes treated with insulin in France.

Diabetes Metab

CEMKA, 43 boulevard Maréchal-Joffre, F-92340 Bourg-la-Reine, France.

Published: June 2005

Extrapolating from the results of the 1998 and 2000 French National Sickness Insurance Fund surveys, it can be estimated that at the end of 2002, 3.4% of the French population, i.e. 2,150,000 individuals, had diagnosed type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus. Among these individuals, 2,050,000 were taking drug treatments and about 100,000 were treated with diet alone. About 16.3% of diabetics given drug treatments were taking insulin, alone or in combination with oral antidiabetic drugs, i.e. approximately 447,000 individuals including 316,000 (70.6%) with type 2 diabetes. Regarding all individuals with type 2 diabetes, the percentage treated with insulin (alone or in combination with oral antidiabetic drugs) increased from 12.3% in 1998 to 16.5% in 2002, for a mean increase of 7.4% per year. This rate is globally corroborated, although the study periods are not exactly comparable, by changes in sales volumes for insulin observed over recent years showing an even more rapid mean annual growth of 13.4%. The difference between these two estimates suggests that either the mean dose of insulin delivered is increasing or that the increase in the number of treated diabetics is underestimated by the National Sickness Insurance Fund. Mean age of patients treated with insulin alone (type 1 and type 2 diabetics considered together) was 56.3 years with a median of 60 years and a sex ratio (M/F) close to 1 (0.9). There are no national data detailing monitoring practices in insulin-treated patients. Published analyses focus on type 2 diabetics treated with oral antidiabetic drugs and often exclude patients taking insulin. Blood glucose control is poor (HbA1c>8%) in approximately one-third of patients with type 2 diabetes and different studies have shown that in France among subjects with type 2 diabetes 3.1% are taking two oral antidiabetic drugs or more at maximal doses and have poorly controlled blood glucose levels. The percentage of insulin-treated diabetics is increasing steadily, but remains lower than observed in other European countries (generally reported in the 24% to 30% range). This special situation in France could fade out in upcoming years with better awareness of the importance of metabolic control, improved insulin therapy in this context, and improved conditions for use of insulin.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

type diabetes
20
oral antidiabetic
16
antidiabetic drugs
16
treated insulin
12
insulin
9
type
9
national sickness
8
sickness insurance
8
insurance fund
8
type type
8

Similar Publications

Objective: Managing blood glucose levels is challenging for elite athletes with type 1 diabetes (T1D) as competition can cause unpredictable fluctuations. While fear of hypoglycemia during physical activity is well documented, research on hyperglycemia-related anxiety (HRA) is limited. HRA refers to the heightened fear that hyperglycemia-related symptoms will impair functioning.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aims: Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is more common in certain ethnic groups. This systematic review compares mortality risk between people with T2D from different ethnic groups and includes recent larger studies.

Methods: We searched nine databases using PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO CRD42022372542).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aims: This post hoc analysis aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of the non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist finerenone by baseline diuretic use in FIDELITY, a pre-specified pooled analysis of the phase III trials FIDELIO-DKD and FIGARO-DKD.

Methods And Results: Eligible patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and chronic kidney disease (CKD; urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio [UACR] ≥30-<300 mg/g and estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] ≥25-≤90 ml/min/1.73 m, or UACR ≥300-≤5000 mg/g and eGFR ≥25 ml/min/1.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Type 2 diabetes (T2D) causes increased health care resource utilization (HCRU) and costs in the United States. People with T2D are more likely to have atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), which is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Medical associations recommend cardioprotective antidiabetic medications, including sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs), to reduce the risk of cardiovascular events in patients with T2D with established, or a high risk of, ASCVD, but not all eligible patients receive these medications.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Both glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) have been shown to improve glycated hemoglobin A1c (A1c) levels among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Recently, a US real-world study found statistically significant improvements in A1c levels among patients using GLP-1 RA and a CGM device, compared with a matched cohort receiving only GLP-1 RA.

Objectives: To assess the cost-effectiveness from a US payer perspective of initiating CGM (FreeStyle Libre Systems) in people living with T2DM using a GLP-1 RA therapy, compared with GLP-1 RA alone.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!