Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Purpose: To summarize 13 communities' experiences with selecting, implementing, and evaluating teen pregnancy prevention interventions within the CDC Community Coalition Partnership Programs for the Prevention of Teen Pregnancy. The study focuses on decision-making processes and barriers encountered in five categories of interventions: reproductive health services, reproductive health education, parent-child communication, male involvement, and programs for pregnant and parenting teens.
Methods: Telephone interviews were conducted with program directors, lead evaluators, and community coalition chairpersons in each of the 13 communities. The descriptive analysis explored factors that influenced community decisions to develop or not to develop interventions. These factors were analyzed by type of intervention.
Results: Each community implemented an average of six interventions and operated them with a variety of funding sources. Interventions were selected on the basis of need, and the community needs and assets assessment process was "very important" for most reported interventions. Decision-making was influenced most often by project staff, the coalition, or related work groups. Teens were infrequently viewed as primary decision-makers in the selection of interventions. Communities with family planning services as hub agencies were more likely to address reproductive services and reproductive health education. Communities with child advocacy or youth-serving agencies were more likely to focus on other intervention categories. About two-thirds of the interventions were evaluated by either process or outcome measures, or by both.
Conclusions: This study highlights important lessons learned that should be considered in examinations of the overall effectiveness of this community coalition approach to the prevention of teen pregnancy.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2005.05.009 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!