Objectives: To assess the interobserver reliability in assessing postural stability and to compare with results obtained by computerized posturography.

Design: Cross-sectional study.

Setting: Balance clinic, teaching hospital.

Participants: 81 patients attending with a primary complaint of imbalance.

Main Outcome Measures: Inter-rater reliability between two clinicians and the modified Clinical Test for the Sensory Interaction on Balance (mCTSIB) as assessed by the Neurocom VSR Balance Master platform.

Results: Inter-rater reliability scores were high (0.53-0.81) for all conditions of the mCTSIB except for the easiest, i.e. firm surface eyes open, where concordance levels were poor to fair.

Conclusions: Overall there was good agreement between observers and the computerized mCTSIB.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2273.2005.00988.xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

interobserver reliability
8
postural stability
8
inter-rater reliability
8
reliability evaluating
4
evaluating postural
4
stability clinicians
4
clinicians posturography
4
posturography objectives
4
objectives assess
4
assess interobserver
4

Similar Publications

Evaluation of Peer Review of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Operator Performance.

Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes

January 2025

Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle (J.A.D., E.J.S., D.H.A.).

Background: Case-based peer review of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is used by many hospitals for quality improvement and to make decisions regarding physician competency. However, there are no studies testing the reliability or validity of peer review for PCI performance evaluation.

Methods: We recruited interventional cardiologists from 12 Veterans Affairs Health System facilities throughout the United States to provide PCI cases for review.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The most commonly used classification for proximal fifth metatarsal fractures has not shown good reproducibility. The aim of this study was to evaluate the intraobserver and interobserver agreement of a new classification system for such fractures.

Methods: The study involved the development of a novel classification system that categorized these fractures into 2 main types and 2 subtypes.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: This study was performed to introduce, evaluate, and compare various novel assessment protocols designed for straightforward, reliable, and reproducible measurement of alveolar bone levels. These protocols are intended for standardized periodontal assessment and follow-up, utilizing cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images and manipulation of Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) viewer software.

Materials And Methods: Two experienced oral and maxillofacial radiologists developed 5 distinct radiographic measurement protocols.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Validation of a novel tool for automated tooth modelling by fusion of CBCT-derived roots with the respective IOS-derived crowns.

J Dent

December 2024

OMFS-IMPATH Research Group, Department of Imaging and Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Dental Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden. Electronic address:

Article Synopsis
  • This study aimed to validate a novel AI tool that combines dental images from two different sources, cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and intraoral scanners (IOS), to create accurate tooth models.
  • The evaluation involved analyzing a dataset from 30 patients, calculating various accuracy metrics for the AI-generated models, and comparing them to both expert manual methods and existing segmentation approaches.
  • Results indicated that the AI-based approach achieved high accuracy similar to manual methods but was significantly faster, suggesting it could improve efficiency in dental practices.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: This study aims to evaluate the inter-observer variability in assessing the optic disc in fundus photographs and its implications for establishing ground truth in AI research.

Methods: Seventy subjects were screened during a screening campaign. Fundus photographs were classified into normal (NL) or abnormal (GS: glaucoma and glaucoma suspects) by two masked glaucoma specialists.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!