A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Incidence of Wra antigen and anti-Wra in a Spanish population. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study investigates the frequency of the Wr(a) antigen and anti-Wr(a) antibodies in Valencia, Spain, using samples from 110,000 blood donors and various patient groups.
  • The incidence of the Wr(a) antigen was found to be 1 in 785, with anti-Wr(a) antibodies detected in 59 samples across healthy donors, pregnant women, and transfusion patients, with immunoglobulin M being the most common type in healthy individuals.
  • Overall, the findings suggest that while the incidence of Wr(a) antigen and anti-Wr(a) is comparable to other European regions, the clinical significance of anti-Wr(a) is limited, as only half of the cases could potentially have clinical implications.

Article Abstract

Background: This study reports the incidence of Wr(a) antigen and anti-Wr(a) in Valencia, Spain.

Study Design And Methods: The incidence of the Wr(a) antigen in 110,000 healthy blood donors was estimated. Likewise, the incidence of anti-Wr(a) was analyzed in a population consisting of 730 healthy blood donors, 356 pregnant women, and 581 patients who received transfusions from the area of Valencia, Spain.

Results: The incidence of Wr(a) antigen was 1 in 785. Overall, anti-Wr(a) was found in 59 samples: 20 healthy blood donors (1/37), 18 pregnant women (1/20), and 21 patients who received transfusions (1/28). The most frequent immunoglobulin class of anti-Wr(a) in healthy blood donors was immunoglobulin M, either alone (8 cases) or plus immunoglobulin G (IgG; 8 cases); the IgG1 and IgG3 were the IgG subclasses most frequently detected in pregnant women (12 cases) and in patients who received transfusions (12 cases). Only 51 percent of the anti-Wr(a) appeared to have the potential to be clinically significant.

Conclusion: These data show that the incidence of Wr(a) antigen and anti-Wr(a) among the population from Valencia is similar to that reported in other European areas and suggest that the development of anti-Wr(a) is facilitated by the presence of a hyperactive immune system. The clinical relevance of anti-Wr(a) is limited, however.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1537-2995.2005.00196.xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

incidence wra
20
wra antigen
20
healthy blood
16
blood donors
16
antigen anti-wra
12
pregnant women
12
patients received
12
received transfusions
12
anti-wra
9
incidence
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!