Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
The aim of this study was to analyze the morphologic changes of the craniofacial skeleton in synostotic plagiocephaly after cranial distraction. Preoperative and postoperative computed tomography scans were taken, and three-dimensional reconstruction was then performed. Three measurements were obtained: intracranial volume, volume of the middle cranial fossa, and length of the zygomatic arch. Intracranial volume reached values that were normal for a 2-year-old child postoperatively, and the discrepancy between left and right half volumes decreased over time. The discrepancy of the volume of the middle cranial fossa also decreased after surgery, and the asymmetry of the zygomatic arch improved significantly. Based on these objective findings, the authors believe that cranial distraction could favorably affect craniofacial dysmorphology of synostotic frontal plagiocephaly.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.scs.0000168995.27882.66 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!