Objective: To review systematically all prospective, randomized trials published in English quantifying the success of reclosure of the disrupted laparotomy wound.
Data Sources: The MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane databases were searched from 1966 to 2004. References were hand-searched and their authors contacted to identify all published and unpublished eligible studies.
Methods Of Study Selection: We included all prospective, randomized trials measuring successful reclosure of disrupted laparotomy wounds in human subjects. Studies with fascial disruption, subfascial abscess, or ongoing contamination were excluded. Of over 2,098 potentially relevant articles, 8 were included, incorporating 348 patients.
Tabulation, Integration, And Results: Two authors determined study inclusion. One investigator abstracted data, and a second checked for accuracy. The main outcome was successful healing after wound reclosure. Timing of reclosure, utility of antibiotics, and reclosure techniques were also analyzed. Successful healing after reclosure ranged between 81% and 100%. Failed healing included both superficial wound separation and reaccumulation of abscess. No serious morbidity or mortality was reported. Compared with healing by secondary intention, reclosure resulted in faster healing times (16-23 days versus 61-72 days), and in the one study that evaluated it, 6.4 fewer office visits. The optimal timing and technique for reclosure and the utility of antibiotics were inconclusive.
Conclusion: Reclosure of disrupted laparotomy wounds was successful in over 80% of patients. Failed reclosure resulted in no life-threatening complications. Reclosure of disrupted laparotomy wounds is safe and decreases healing times.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000171114.75338.06 | DOI Listing |
Am Psychol
November 2021
School of Social Work, University of Connecticut, Hartford Campus.
Spreading rapidly across the United States beginning in the spring of 2020, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic radically disrupted Americans' lives. Previous studies of community-wide disasters suggested people are fairly resilient and identified resources and strategies that promote that resilience. Yet, the COVID-19 pandemic is in some ways unique, with high levels of uncertainty, evolving implications and restrictions, and varied and uneven impacts.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAm J Surg
June 2013
Center for Health Quality, Outcomes and Economic Research, Bedford VA Medical Center, Bedford, MA 01730, USA.
Background: The Patient Safety Indicator (PSI) Postoperative Wound Dehiscence (PWD) is an administrative data-based algorithm that flags cases using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) code 54.61 (abdominal wall disruption reclosure). We examined how often PWD missed events and explored ways to improve event identification.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Wound Care
January 2013
Gynelocologic Oncology Division, The Helen Schneider Hospital for Women, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Objective: To assess the outcome of active management of disrupted wounds through surgical approximation and re-closure.
Method: A prospective, non-comparative study, on all consecutive patients with disrupted laparotomy wounds treated at a tertiary medical centre, from November 2009 to December 2011. Data on patient demographics, diagnosis, type of abdominal incision, initial closure technique, infections and results of secondary re-closure were collected from the medical files.
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater
July 2009
Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Conventional soft-tissue reclosure methods-sutures and staples-require substantial organized-collagen content. Some tissues lack extensive intrinsic collagenous content. Wound disruption consequences range from newly closed abdominal wounds bursting open, to post-cesarean wombs splitting at delivery, to heart valves loosening.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Pediatr Surg
June 2006
Division of Pediatric Urology, Department of Urology, The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Background/purpose: In patients with failed primary or secondary closure of bladder exstrophy, repeat osteotomy is useful in facilitating reconstruction. The clinical consequences of repeated surgical disruption of the pelvic ring have not been carefully described, however.
Methods: We reviewed our experience with exstrophy patients who had undergone repeat pelvic osteotomy (RPO) and analyzed patient history, complications, and orthopedic outcomes.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!