Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Background: Earlier detection of childhood vision disorders is a prominent goal of vision screening. The Medical Technology and Innovation (MTI) PhotoScreener addresses this objective. Use of this camera does not require verbal feedback and may be administered early in a child's development. Decreasing the variability in photograph grading results will boost the utility of any photoscreening system. This report aims to understand and to decrease intra- and inter-observer variability in grading photoscreening photographs.
Methods: We dissected the photograph grading process and quantified the intra- and inter-observer agreement using intraclass plot correlation coefficients. We evaluated the outcome of a two grader verification system vs. adjudicated measurements with Receiver Operator Characteristic (ROC) curves.
Participants: Data on 955 children under 5 years of age, normal except for refractive error, each with complete photoscreening and eye examination data, culled from two previous studies.
Main Outcome Measures: Intra- and inter-observer agreement in measuring bright crescent dimensions and pupillary diameters. Sensitivity and specificity of detection of hyperopia.
Results: Measurements of bright crescents are associated with greater variability than are measurements of pupillary diameters. Recognition and omission of light "rim" measurements from photograph grading will result in superior inter-observer agreement. Photograph independent errors increase variability and may be corrected by remeasurement. A verification system in which the most discrepant 5% of measurements are redone results in ROC curves similar to adjudicated dimension.
Conclusions: We conclude: 1) two novices grading photographs can do as well as one expert in most cases; 2) the proposed grading methodology has undergone statistical validation and can be used in other areas of ophthalmology and medicine; and 3) inter-observer variability, one of the limitations of photoscreening photograph grading, can be reduced. For 95% of the photographs, two novices achieve similar true positive and true negative values with or without adjudication.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!