A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Protecting RNA in fixed tissue: an alternative method for LCM users. | LitMetric

Protecting RNA in fixed tissue: an alternative method for LCM users.

J Neurosci Methods

Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of São Paulo, Av. Prof. Lineu Prestes, 1524, 05508-900 São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

Published: October 2005

RNA degradation is a major drawback in most common fixation protocols in techniques that require both RNA integrity and preserved morphology, such as laser capture microdissection (LCM) followed by RT-PCR. Moreover, RNA isolation kits especially developed for LCM samples are very expensive. Our aim was to determine an easy protocol that ideally must provide an acceptable morphology, allow proper laser capture of selected cells and improve RNA yield and quality. In this study, retinas were dissected, briefly incubated in a RNA preservative and fixed in 2% paraformaldehyde before being cut on a cryostat. LCM was carried out in retinal sections for immediate RNA isolation, by using TRIzol common protocol with minor modifications. Real-time PCR was performed next in order to compare availability of RNA from samples submitted to different protocols. The use of the RNA preservative followed by a fast fixation did not jeopardize tissue morphology, allowing microdissection of selected cells, combined to minor modifications in usual RNA isolation procedures, significantly improved RNA yield and quality. Furthermore, only LCM samples submitted to our protocol provided amplifiable mRNA, as determined by real-time PCR. Taken together, the combination of the described procedures resulted in a reliable alternative for LCM users.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2005.04.019DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

rna isolation
12
rna
10
lcm users
8
laser capture
8
lcm samples
8
selected cells
8
rna yield
8
yield quality
8
rna preservative
8
minor modifications
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!