Background: The objective of this systematic review was to assess the safety and efficacy of subcutaneous recombinant (r) HCG and high-dose rLH compared with intramuscular urinary (u) uHCG for inducing final oocyte maturation and triggering ovulation.
Methods: We searched the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group trials register (August 27, 2003), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL on The Cochrane Library, issue 4, 2003), MEDLINE (1966 to February 2004) and EMBASE (1980 to February 2004). Searches were not limited by language. The bibliographies of included and excluded trials and abstracts of major meetings were searched for additional trials. Authors and pharmaceutical companies were contacted for missing and unpublished data. Only truly randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. Assessment of inclusion/exclusion, quality assessment and data extraction were performed independently by at least two reviewers.
Results: Seven RCTs were identified, four comparing rHCG and uHCG and three comparing rhLH and uHCG. There was no statistically significant difference between rHCG and uHCG regarding the ongoing pregnancy/live birth rate [odds ratio (OR) 0.98; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.69-1.39], clinical pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate or incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). There was no statistically significant difference between rhLH and uHCG regarding the ongoing pregnancy/live birth rate (OR 0.94; 95% CI 0.50-1.76), pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate or incidence of OHSS. rHCG was associated with a reduction in the incidence of local site reactions (OR 0.47; 95% CI 0.32-0.70).
Conclusions: According to these data, there is no evidence of a difference in clinical outcomes between urinary and recombinant gonadotrophins used for induction of final follicular maturation. Additional factors should be considered when choosing gonadotrophin type, including safety, cost and drug availability.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dei035 | DOI Listing |
Pilot Feasibility Stud
January 2025
Department of Internal Medicine - Cardiology, Virginia Commonwealth University, West Hospital 8th Floor, North Wing, Richmond, VA, 23298, USA.
Background: To determine the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a 6-month tailored non-linear progressive physical activity intervention (PAI) for lymphoma patients undergoing chemotherapy.
Methods: Patients newly diagnosed with lymphoma (non-Hodgkin (NHL) or Hodgkin (HL)) were randomized into the PAI or healthy living intervention (HLI) control (2:1). Feasibility was assessed by examining accrual, adherence, and retention rates.
Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul
January 2025
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Background: Dialectical behavioral therapy (DBT) and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) are both effective in treating borderline personality disorder (BPD). Impulsivity and impaired decision-making are prominent features of BPD, and therapeutic interventions targeting these symptoms could lead to significant improvements.
Objective/hypothesis: We hypothesized that intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS), a modified rTMS protocol that targets the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, would enhance the therapeutic effects of DBT, leading to greater improvements in impulsivity and decision-making compared with sham stimulation.
Chiropr Man Therap
January 2025
Musculoskeletal Epidemiology Research Group, University of Zurich and Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.
Background: Blinding is essential for mitigating biases in trials of low back pain (LBP). Our main objectives were to assess the feasibility of blinding: (1) participants randomly allocated to active or placebo spinal manual therapy (SMT), and (2) outcome assessors. We also explored blinding by levels of SMT lifetime experience and recent LBP, and factors contributing to beliefs about the assigned intervention.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSyst Rev
January 2025
Department of Neurosurgery, Pingxiang People's Hospital, Pingxiang, Jiangxi Province, 337000, China.
Background: A systematic appraisal of the comparative efficacy and safety profiles of naso-intestinal tube versus gastric tube feeding in the context of enteral nutrition for mechanically ventilated (MV) patients is imperative. Such an evaluation is essential to inform clinical practice, ensuring that the chosen method of nutritional support is both optimal and safe for this patient population.
Methods: We executed an exhaustive search across PubMed et al.
BMC Med Educ
January 2025
Department of Surgery, Saint-Louis Regional Hospital, Gaston Berger University, Road of Ngallelle, 234, Saint-Louis, Senegal.
Introduction: Video feedback, particularly with a head-mounted camera, has previously been described as a useful debriefing tool in well-funded health systems but has never been performed in a low-resource environment. The purpose of this randomized, intervention-controlled study is to evaluate the feasibility of using video feedback with a head-mounted camera during intestinal anastomosis simulation training in a low-resource setting.
Methodology: This study recruited 14 first-year surgery residents in Senegal, who were randomized into control and camera groups.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!