A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Repair of iatrogenic temporal lobe encephalocele after canal wall down mastoidectomy in the presence of active cholesteatoma. | LitMetric

Repair of iatrogenic temporal lobe encephalocele after canal wall down mastoidectomy in the presence of active cholesteatoma.

Otol Neurotol

Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Communicative Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.

Published: July 2005

Objective: Although mastoid and middle ear obliteration provides the ultimate repair of an encephalocele, retained squamous epithelium may result in the occult recurrence of cholesteatoma. For most patients, a preferable technique is to perform a canal-wall-up mastoidectomy with middle fossa craniotomy. However, temporal lobe encephaloceles are occasionally found in patients with canal-wall-down cavities along with active cholesteatoma. We sought to describe our management strategy for this dilemma.

Study Design: Retrospective review.

Setting: Tertiary referral center.

Patients: We reviewed all patients with encephaloceles treated by the primary surgeon. Patients without active cholesteatoma and a canal-wall-down cavity were excluded.

Intervention: Surgical management of the encephalocele and cholesteatoma.

Main Outcome Measure: Successful repair and a noninfected ear.

Results: Three patients met the inclusion criteria. All had previous canal-wall-down surgery for cholesteatoma by outside surgeons and presented with chronic otorrhea, large tegmen defects, and brain herniation into the mastoid cavity. All had incomplete removal of their posterior canal wall. Our management strategy involved completing the canal-wall-down mastoidectomy and repairing the temporal floor defect using a three-layer closure via a middle fossa craniotomy. This included suture repair of the dural defect with or without a graft, a temporalis muscle rotation flap, and a split-calvarial bone graft. All patients recovered from their surgery without evidence of further cerebrospinal fluid leak, encephalocele, or cholesteatoma with a minimum follow-up time of 6 months.

Conclusions: A temporal lobe encephalocele can be safely repaired while maintaining a mastoid bowl. This may be the safest treatment option for patients with active cholesteatoma.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.mao.0000178119.46290.e1DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

active cholesteatoma
16
temporal lobe
12
lobe encephalocele
8
canal wall
8
middle fossa
8
fossa craniotomy
8
management strategy
8
patients active
8
cholesteatoma
7
patients
7

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!