A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Comparison of density functionals for differences between the high- (5T2g) and low- (1A1g) spin states of iron(II) compounds. IV. Results for the ferrous complexes [Fe(L)('NHS4')]. | LitMetric

Comparison of density functionals for differences between the high- (5T2g) and low- (1A1g) spin states of iron(II) compounds. IV. Results for the ferrous complexes [Fe(L)('NHS4')].

J Chem Phys

Institut de Chimie Moleculaire de Grenoble (ICMG, FR-2607), Laboratoire d'Etudes Dynamiques et Structurales de la Sélectivité, Equipe de Chimie Théorique, Université Joseph Fourier (Grenoble I), F38041 Grenoble, France.

Published: June 2005

Previous work testing density functionals for use in calculating high-spin-low-spin energy differences, deltaE(HL), for iron(II) spin-crossover transitions has tended to conclude that only properly reparametrized hybrid functionals can predict deltaE(HL) since it seems to depend critically on a correct description of the electron pairing energy governed by the exchange term. Exceptions to this rule are the previous three papers (I, II, and III in the present series of papers) where it was found that modern generalized gradient approximations (GGAs) and meta-GGAs could do as well as hybrid functionals, if not better, for this type of problem. In the present paper, we extend these previous studies to five more molecules which are too large to treat with high-quality ab initio calculations, namely, the series [Fe(L)('NHS(4)')], where NHS(4)=2.2'-bis(2-mercaptophenylthio)diethylamine dianion, and L=NH(3), N(2)H(4), PMe(3), CO, and NO(+). Since we know of no reliable experimental estimate of deltaE(HL), we content ourselves with a comparison against the experimentally determined ground-state spin symmetry including, in so far as possible, finite-temperature effects. Together with the results of Papers I, II, and III, this paper provides a test of a large number of functionals against the high-spin/low-spin properties of a diverse set of Fe(II) compounds, making it possible to draw some particularly interesting conclusions. Trends among different classes of functionals are discussed and it is pointed out that there is at least one functional, namely, the OLYP generalized gradient approximation, which is able to give a reasonably good description of the delicate spin energetics of Fe(II) coordination compounds without resorting to hybrid functionals which require the relatively more expensive calculation of a Hartree-Fock-type exchange term.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1927081DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

hybrid functionals
12
density functionals
8
exchange term
8
papers iii
8
generalized gradient
8
functionals
7
comparison density
4
functionals differences
4
differences high-
4
high- 5t2g
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!