The outcome of various cements in combination with titanium reconstruction plates after segmental resection of the mandible.

Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg

University of Heidelberg Medical School, Department of Oral and Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany.

Published: August 2005

We report on 82 patients who had segmental resection of the mandible and immediate reconstruction with titanium plates, which were supplemented by polymethylmethacrylate cement (n=32), glass ionomer cement (n=27), silicone (n=9), or nothing (n=14). The mean (S.D.) follow-up time was 92 (26) months. Six months after operation, 27 (46%) of the plates with polymethylmethacrylate cement or glass ionomer cement were removed. During the same time period, four (28%) of the plates were removed in the group with no additional material and two (22%) in the group that had silicone. There was a significant difference in survival time of the metal between the group with silicone and the group with glass ionomer cement (p=0.014, log rank). Although silicone performed slightly better than the reconstruction plate on its own, we doubt whether any cement is necessary.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2004.11.017DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

glass ionomer
12
ionomer cement
12
segmental resection
8
resection mandible
8
polymethylmethacrylate cement
8
group silicone
8
cement
6
outcome cements
4
cements combination
4
combination titanium
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!