Ovarian stimulation is an integral part of assisted reproductive technologies (ART). Under physiologic conditions, both follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinizing hormone (LH) activity is necessary to guarantee follicle growth and maturation. This can be shown in patients with hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism, who have no endogenous FSH or LH activity. The use of FSH alone in these patients does not result in sufficient follicle growth and oocyte quality. Approximately 75IU of LH activity per day is necessary to guarantee optimal success. The use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists in normogonadotrophic patients may result in suppression of LH levels below a certain threshold, resulting in suboptimal outcomes. The question under discussion in this article is the threshold level of LH below which exogenous LH activity should be added to provide optimal ovarian response. Different studies indicate that the endogenous LH level should be 0.5-1.5IU in long-term protocol situations. Patients treated in ultra-long GnRH agonist protocols, as well as older patients, patients with a low response to gonadotropin treatment, and patients treated with a GnRH antagonist protocol may benefit from exogenous LH activity. There are three ways of adding LH activity in ovarian stimulation cycles. Nowadays, lutropin alfa (recombinant LH) may be the optimal choice since it has no chorionic gonadotropin activity and allows individual dosage titration. Every menotropin preparation currently on the market contains some chorionic gonadotropin activity. However, more data are necessary before evidence-based recommendations regarding LH supplementation in ovarian stimulation protocols can be given.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.2165/00024677-200302050-00002 | DOI Listing |
J Clin Endocrinol Metab
January 2025
Center for Reproductive Medicine, Guangdong Women and Children Hospital, Guangzhou 511400, Guangdong Province, China.
Context: Progestins have recently been used as an alternative for gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues to prevent premature luteinizing hormone surge due to the application of vitrification technology. However, the long-term efficacy and safety of a progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) regimen, including oocyte competence, cumulative live birth rate (LBR), and offspring outcomes, remain to be investigated.
Objective: To compare cumulative LBR of preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) cycles between a PPOS regimen and GnRH analogues.
J Assist Reprod Genet
January 2025
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, 06620, Turkey.
Hum Reprod Open
January 2025
Regional Center of Pharmacovigilance, Pharmacology Department, Cochin Hospital, AP-HP.Centre-Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Study Question: Is there an association between dydrogesterone exposure during early pregnancy and the reporting of birth defects?
Summary Answer: This observational analysis based on global safety data showed an increased reporting of birth defects, mainly hypospadias and congenital heart defects (CHD), in pregnancies exposed to dydrogesterone, especially when comparing to progesterone.
What Is Known Already: Intravaginal administration of progesterone is the standard of care to overcome luteal phase progesterone deficiency induced by ovarian stimulation in ART. In recent years, randomized controlled clinical trials demonstrated that oral dydrogesterone was non-inferior for pregnancy rate at 12 weeks of gestation and could be an alternative to micronized vaginal progesterone.
J Assist Reprod Genet
January 2025
Department of Assisted Reproductive Medicine, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, 2699nd West Gao Ke Road, Shanghai, 201204, China.
Purpose: Women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) show greater heterogeneity in ovarian responses during ovarian stimulation. We aimed to investigate the potential predicting factors among individualized basic parameters that affect poor or hyper ovarian responses in PCOS patients.
Methods: We retrospectively screened 2058 women with PCOS who underwent their first cycle of in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection.
Objective: We aimed to compare highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin (hp-hMG) and recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (rFSH) in short antagonist in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles of patients with poor ovarian reserve (POR). Limited research exists on this comparison in short antagonist cycles for this patient group.
Materials And Methods: This retrospective cohort study involved 165 POR patients aged 18-45 years who underwent IVF between 2018 and 2022.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!