Retraction.

Science

Life Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Building 934, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.

Published: June 2005

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.308.5729.1740bDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

retraction
4
retraction
1

Similar Publications

The journal retracts the article entitled "Environmental Impact of Pharmaceutical Pollutants: Synergistic Toxicity of Ivermectin and Cypermethrin" [...

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aim: The Transorbital and supraorbital minimally invasive approaches have been defined to reach intraorbital structures, adjacent sinuses, skull base, and other intracranial targets in this region. These approaches reduce the possible cosmetic and brain retraction-related morbidities caused by traditional transcranial approaches. Although these pathways are being studied endoscopically, a stereotactic approach has not been defined.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Comparative study of robotic-assisted vs. laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: a single-center experience.

Front Oncol

January 2025

Department of Colorectal Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Digestive Cancer, Tianjin, China.

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) surgeries are commonly performed using either robotic-assisted colorectal surgery (RACS) or laparoscopic colorectal surgery (LCS). This study aimed to compare clinical and surgical outcomes between RACS and LCS for CRC patients.

Methods: We included 225 patients from Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital (TJMUCH) between January 2021 and June 2024, divided into RACS (n=82) and LCS (n=143) groups.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!