Background: Late band erosion is an uncommon complication after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB). Overall erosion rate in our practice is approximately 1.6%. Our first 10 erosion patients underwent a rebanding procedure after previous Lap-Band removal. This study gives the results of midterm follow-up.
Methods: 10 patients underwent Lap-Band removal for erosion. Then, 4 to 6 months after band removal, between December 1999 and February 2002, the 10 patients underwent LAGB again. Post-operatively, patients were seen at least every 3 months, and routine endoscopy was performed 1, 2 and 3 years after rebanding. Follow-up in this study was 36-63 (mean 48) months.
Results: No postoperative complications occurred; however, the first patient required conversion to laparotomy. Mean BMI was 40.6 (34-50) at the time of the initial LAGB, 34.3 (31-44) at the time of rebanding, and is 28.5 (22-38) at present. There have been 2 late complications: 1 pouch dilatation and 1 port leak. No re-erosions have developed. Satisfaction has been excellent in 9 patients and moderate in 1.
Conclusion: Laparoscopic rebanding is a safe, feasible, minimally invasive and efficacious option as a second bariatric procedure after Lap-Band removal for erosion. However, if the patient is not pleased with the first band, a different bariatric operation should be considered. Our results in the mid-term are excellent, but longer follow-up is necessary to draw definitive conclusions.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1381/0960892053923860 | DOI Listing |
Front Hum Neurosci
August 2022
Olin Neuropsychiatry Research Center, Institute of Living at Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT, United States.
Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) offers a unique opportunity to examine the underlying neuronal mechanisms of surgically assisted weight loss due to its instant, non-invasive, adjustable nature. Six participants with stable excess weight loss (%EWL ≥ 45) completed 2 days of fMRI scanning 1.5-5 years after LAGB surgery.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInt J Surg Case Rep
May 2022
Department of General Digestive and Thoracic Surgery, Hôpital Pasteur, Colmar, France.
Surg Endosc
October 2022
Department of Surgery, Minimally Invasive Surgery and Bariatric Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, USA.
Background: Despite many patients doing well after laparoscopic adjustable gastric band (LAGB) several studies caution offering this procedure for weight loss. The aim of our study was to review our long-term results over a decade.
Methods: Following IRB approval, the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) Data Registry was used to identify LAGB placement between 2007 and 2013 by a single surgeon.
Chest
September 2021
Department of Thoracic Surgery, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas TX.
A 49-year-old woman presented to the ED with sudden onset abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting. Her medical history included an uncomplicated gastric lap band surgery 9 years ago and subsequent removal of lap band after 6 years. She had a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and cholecystectomy 5 months prior to the current presentation.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFObes Surg
November 2019
General and laparoscopic Surgery, Leonardo Clinic, Sovigliana-Vinci (Florence), Italy.
Introduction: Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) is proven to be a safe and effective treatment option for obesity in the long term. However, in recent decades, LAGB prevalence progressively decreased worldwide principally due to the incidence and the management of the complications. Understanding the optimal management of the complications becomes therefore of primary importance.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!