Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Introduction: There is considerable variability in individual susceptibility to altitude decompression sickness (DCS). The Air Force Research Laboratory Altitude DCS Research Database consists of extensive information on 2980 altitude exposures conducted with consistent procedures and endpoint criteria. We used this database to quantify the variation in susceptibility and determine if anthropometric and/or physiologic variables could be used to predict DCS risk.
Methods: There were 240 subjects who participated in at least 4 of 70 exposure profiles in which between 5 and 95% of all subjects tested developed DCS symptoms. A subject/study ratio (SSR) was calculated by dividing the DCS experienced by a subject during all their exposures by the DCS incidence for all subjects who participated in the identical exposures. The SSR was used to identify the relative susceptibility of subjects for use in analyzing possible relationships between DCS susceptibility and the variables of height, weight, body mass index, age, percent body fat, and aerobic capacity.
Results: The DCS incidence was 46.5% during 1879 subject-exposures by subjects exposed at least 4 times. A significant relationship existed between higher DCS susceptibility and the combination of lower aerobic capacity and greater weight (p < 0.05).
Discussion: Despite a correlation, less than 13% of the variation in DCS susceptibility was accounted for by the best combination of variables, weight and VO2max.
Conclusion: Differences in DCS susceptibility cover a wide range and appear to be related to some anthropometric and physiologic variables. However, there was insufficient correlation to allow prediction of an individual's susceptibility.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!