Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
The dosimetry of 106Ru/106Rh beta-emitting eye applicators is still inadequate. Manufacturer's specifications of absolute dose rates are loaded with a +/- 30% error, and the relative distribution of activity on the surface is measured on a few points only, using a 3-mm plastic scintillation probe. While reducing the absolute error of dose rate measurements to +/- 15% by a method published earlier, we now present a phantom using small thermoluminescent dosimetry crystals for refined assessment of its distribution over the surface. Evaluation of two applicators revealed a 50% increase in activity in the midperiphery in one and a steep falloff of activity 1 mm within the margin of both specimens. The method and findings are demonstrated in detail and compared to those reported by other authors.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000310276 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!