A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

A prospective evaluation of four immunodiagnotic assays for human leptospirosis. | LitMetric

A prospective evaluation of four immunodiagnotic assays for human leptospirosis.

Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health

Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, Thailand.

Published: December 2004

This was a prospective evaluation of four immunodiagnostic assays for human leptospirosis, including the indirect immunofluorescence test (IFA), the microscopic agglutination test (MAT), the LEPTO dipstick, and the latex agglutination (LA) test. Four hundred ninety-two serum samples were collected from 348 patients who presented with acute fever without localizing signs. The sensitivities of the IFA, MAT, Dipstick, and LA were 91.9, 76.6, 77.4, and 83.1%, respectively. The specificities of these assays were 100.0, 100.0, 89.3, and 83.5, respectively. Even though IFA showed the highest overall sensitivity and specificity, when acute sera were considered, the LA was the most sensitive (28.7%). All 3 genus specific antibody assays had broad reactivity against various serogroups. The MAT is best suited for the reference laboratory, where it can be maintained with the battery of live antigens; the IFA is suited for a laboratory with sophisticated equipment and technical expertise; the Dipstick and LA are suitable for peripheral laboratories which lack expensive equipment and expertise.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

prospective evaluation
8
assays human
8
human leptospirosis
8
agglutination test
8
evaluation immunodiagnotic
4
assays
4
immunodiagnotic assays
4
leptospirosis prospective
4
evaluation immunodiagnostic
4
immunodiagnostic assays
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!