A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

The influence of the tibial sagittal cut on component position in the Oxford knee. | LitMetric

The influence of the tibial sagittal cut on component position in the Oxford knee.

Knee

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Warwick Hospital, Lakin Road, Warwick CV34 5BW, UK.

Published: June 2005

The alignment of the components of the Oxford knee replacement were analysed before and after modification of technique for performing the sagittal cut. In the 126 knees prior to the change, there was wide variation in the apparent femoral rotation on screened X-rays centred on the tibial component. In the 40 knees after the change, the variability was markedly reduced (traditional technique, mean femoral rotation 7.86 degrees, range -5 degrees to 30 degrees, compared with 3.18 degrees, range 0 degrees to 15 degrees in the modified group, p=0.0001.). We conclude that the apparent rotation of the femur is largely due to variation in position of the sagittal cut. The mean meniscal displacement was not reduced in the modified group but the range was smaller in that no menisci were displaced more than 3.5 mm from the tibial upright compared with 15% in the traditional group. Menisci which were displaced tended to rotate. The mean rotation and range were greater in the unmodified group (5.92 degrees ER range, 20 degrees ER to 25 degrees IR, traditional group, compared with 0.39 degrees ER, range 10 degrees ER to 12.5 degrees IR in the modified group, p=0.001). A simple technique for controlling the direction of the sagittal cut using intra articular landmarks gives reproducible results. The apparent femoral rotation on screened views in extension is reduced as is the range of meniscal displacement and rotation. Application of this technique may be helpful in lateral resurfacing where soft tissue support is less likely to resist meniscal dislocation.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2004.06.012DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

sagittal cut
16
degrees range
16
range degrees
16
femoral rotation
12
degrees
12
degrees degrees
12
modified group
12
oxford knee
8
apparent femoral
8
rotation screened
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!