Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Gas exchange monitoring (GEM) has only recently become available for routine use on ventilated patients. Engström has introduced a new concept of integrated gas exchange monitoring within the Elvira respirator, optionally combined with an external CO2 monitor. The following paper describes a laboratory validation of a prototype of this device with regard to the influence of respiratory variables within their specified ranges: FIO2 0.2-0.6, FIO2-FEO2 (DFO2) 0.02-0.05, FECO2 0.02-0.05, VI 5-20 l/min, p 10-60 mbar, respiratory rate 7-29, VT 500-2,000 ml, inspiratory flow 25-90 l/min, relative humidity 5% and 55%. VO2 and VCO2 (100-700 ml/min) were simulated by gas dilution at a respiratory quotient of 1 using a 'bag-in-the-bottle' test lung for 48 test situations. Two reference measurements per test situation were carried out by mass spectrometry and wet-gas spirometry. The Elvira GEM function uses a self-calibrating fuel cell for FO2 detection, an external infrared CO2 monitor (Eliza) for FECO2 measurement, and differential pressure detection on a venturi principle for inspiratory flow measurement. VI measurement necessitates the use of the Haldane transformation for VO2 and VCO2 calculation. The VO2 (VCO2) repeatability coefficient (2 s) for the reference method was 5.6 (5.5) ml/min compared to 10.3 (10.35) ml/min for the GEM function. The mean relative methodical difference for VO2 (VCO2) was +19% (+4.1%) with limits of agreement (+/- 2 s) of +/- 13% (+/- 8.7%). The systematical difference for VCO2 as well as the variability within different test situations was in an acceptable range for clinical measurement.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!