Outcome of acetabular revision using an uncemented hydroxyapatite-coated component: two- to five-year results and review.

J Arthroplasty

Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospitals, Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK.

Published: February 2005

This is a retrospective review of 50 uncemented acetabular revisions with porous, hydroxyapatite-coated cups. The acetabulum alone was revised in 22 hips and both components were revised in 28 hips. The majority of hips (26) had type 2A (Paprosky) acetabular bone loss. All the revisions were carried out through a posterior approach. The mean duration of follow-up was 32 months (range, 24-52 months). Clinically, there was significant improvement in pain and moderate improvement in movement and mobility, and there is no radiological sign of failure of any cup so far. Re-revision was performed in 3 hips (6%) for recurrent dislocation. Our early results favor the use of this type of cup in acetabular revisions with moderate bone loss, but longer-term follow-up will be required. Key words: acetabulum, hydroxyapatite, revision, bone deficiency, complications.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2004.09.049DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

acetabular revisions
8
revised hips
8
bone loss
8
outcome acetabular
4
acetabular revision
4
revision uncemented
4
uncemented hydroxyapatite-coated
4
hydroxyapatite-coated component
4
component two-
4
two- five-year
4

Similar Publications

Background: Obesity has been consistently proven to be associated with an increased risk of dislocation following total hip arthroplasty (THA). As the prevalence of obesity continues to rise globally, it is of vital importance to minimise risks, including dislocation rates, in these patients undergoing THA.

Methods: We describe a series of patients with obesity, morbid obesity (BMI ≥ 40) and super-obesity (BMI ≥ 50) undergoing THA at our institution over a 10-year period using a dual-mobility acetabular cup.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Iliopsoas tendonitis following total hip arthroplasty (THA) can be challenging to diagnose due to the many causes of postoperative groin pain. This case involves a 66-year-old female with right-sided hip and groin pain and a palpable mass, 3 years post-THA. Initial recovery was unremarkable until the sudden onset of symptoms after exercise.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Salvage arthroplasty for failed proximal femoral fracture fixation is a complex procedure. This involves the removal of the primary failed or broken implant followed by a hip joint replacement procedure. The complications and technical difficulties associated with these surgeries are often difficult to anticipate.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

: Instability is a major reason for revision after total hip arthroplasty (THA), and acetabular cup placement in the "traditional" safe zone does not protect against dislocations. Spinopelvic mobility may play a role in impingement and dislocation after THA. Personalized acetabular cup placement that incorporates spinopelvic mobility is currently lacking in the literature.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The direct anterior approach (DAA) is a popular approach for primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, the contemporary outcomes for DAA THA need further elucidation. Therefore, we aimed to describe implant survivorship, complications, and clinical outcomes after DAA THA.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!