Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Background: Quality of life (QoL) has not been specifically assessed in GH-deficient (GHD) transition patients.
Methods: We assessed QoL at baseline and after 1 and 2 yr of GH treatment in severely GHD patients, using an adult GHD-specific questionnaire, QLS(M)-H. Subjects were randomized to GH, 25.0 microg/kg.d (n = 25) or 12.5 microg/kg.d (n = 28), or no treatment (n = 13). sd scores for QLS-H were calculated from normative data, specific to country of origin, gender, and age range of the patients.
Results: Baseline QLS-H sd scores were -0.35 +/- 1.17 in females and -0.70 +/- 1.05 in males (P = 0.280). sd scores for individual dimensions of ability to become sexually aroused, ability to tolerate stress, body shape, concentration, initiative/drive, physical stamina, and self-confidence were significantly lower than the normal average. Particularly affected were body shape (sd score, -0.80 +/- 0.99; quartile (Q)1:Q3, -1.52:-0.29) and sexual arousal (sd score, -0.41 +/- 0.88; Q1:Q3, -1.15:-0.13). Total QLS-H sd score increased slightly but not significantly for combined GH treatment groups compared with control at yr 1 (0.047 +/- 1.51 vs. -0.32 +/- 1.66; P = 0.845) but not after yr 2 (-0.00 +/- 0.80 vs. 0.12 +/- 0.89; P = 0.385); no dose effect of GH was observed. GH treatment significantly increased sd score from baseline to yr 2 for sexual arousal and body shape (0.23 +/- 0.78, P = 0.038; and 0.46 +/- 1.26, P = 0.035, respectively).
Conclusion: Although overall baseline QoL was not compromised in severely GHD patients during the transition period, dimensions related to age-specific psychological problems were significantly worse than healthy subjects and appeared to positively respond to GH treatment.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/jc.2005-0439 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!