Background: Palonosetron is a second-generation 5-HT(3) receptor antagonist with a prolonged duration of action and higher receptor binding affinity than first-generation agents (ondansetron, granisetron, and dolasetron). Aprepitant is a selective antagonist of substance P/neurokinin 1 that augments the benefit of 5-HT(3) receptor antagonists in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting.
Methods: This randomized, open-label, two-way, crossover trial was designed to evaluate the effect of oral aprepitant on the pharmacokinetics and safety of a single intravenous (IV) dose of palonosetron in 12 healthy subjects. Treatment A consisted of a single IV bolus dose of palonosetron 0.25mg on day 1. Treatment B added oral aprepitant 125 mg on day 1 (30 minutes prior to palonosetron) and 80 mg on days 2 and 3. Blood for pharmacokinetic evaluations was collected through 168 hours after palonosetron administration on days 1 and 15; safety was monitored through day 22.
Results: Mean plasma concentration-time plots for palonosetron were virtually identical for palonosetron administered alone or with concomitant aprepitant. The ratio of geometric least-square mean values (with:without aprepitant) for C(max) was 98.6% (90% confidence interval [CI]: 61.8-157%), and for AUC(0-infinity) the ratio was 101% (90% CI: 85.6-119%). With and without aprepitant coadministration, respectively, mean plasma elimination half-life was 40 hours and 43 hours (difference: -3.0 hours; p = 0.348), mean total body clearance was 130 mL/min and 136 mL/min (difference: -5.6 mL/min; p = 0.735), and mean volume of distribution at steady-state was 410.9 L and 442.3 L (difference: -31.4 L; p = 0.463). Palonosetron alone and the palonosetron/aprepitant regimen were well tolerated.
Conclusion: These results indicate no significant differences in pharmacokinetic parameters for palonosetron between the two treatments, and suggest that palonosetron can be safely coadministered with aprepitant with no alterations in the expected safety profile and no dosage adjustment necessary.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1185/030079905X40481 | DOI Listing |
J Pharmacol Clin Toxicol
September 2024
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, USA.
Cisplatin is a platinum-based chemotherapeutic that causes acute kidney injury in over 30% of patients. The aim of this study was to develop a population pharmacokinetic/toxicodynamic (PKTD) model of cisplatin-induced kidney injury that incorporated plasma total platinum and urinary kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1) concentrations. Cancer patients receiving their first or second round of cisplatin-containing chemotherapy (n=39) were prospectively randomized to a 5-HT antagonist (5-HTA) antiemetic (ondansetron, granisetron, or palonosetron) and had blood and urine collected over 10 days.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Clin Pharmacol
December 2024
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
Cisplatin is a platinum-based chemotherapeutic drug used to treat many types of cancer. The aim of this study was to develop a population pharmacokinetic model that incorporates plasma unbound and bound platinum levels. Cancer patients undergoing their first or second cycle of cisplatin-containing chemotherapy (n = 33) were prospectively randomized to receive a 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) antagonist (5-HTA) antiemetic (ondansetron, granisetron, or palonosetron) followed by blood collection over 10 days.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Perianesth Nurs
December 2024
Graduate Programs of Nurse Anesthesia, Texas Wesleyan University, Fort Worth, TX.
Purpose: Evaluate the effectiveness of various drugs in preventing postdischarge nausea and vomiting (PDNV).
Design: Systematic review.
Methods: A search for evidence was conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane Collaboration, and Google Scholar and gray literature.
J Minim Invasive Surg
December 2024
Department of Community Medicine, ESIC Medical College and Hospital, Chennai, India.
Purpose: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is a prevalent and distressing complication, especially in laparoscopic surgeries. This review compares the efficacy and safety of palonosetron and ondansetron in preventing PONV after laparoscopic surgery.
Methods: A systematic review was conducted in PubMed, Google Scholar, Semantic Scholar, and Cochrane Library to identify comparative studies that reported the efficacy (nausea and vomiting) at three postoperative time points T1 (0-2 hours), T2 (2-6 hours), T3 (6-24 hours) and safety (incidence of adverse effects).
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!