Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Objective: To investigate empirically change in medical decision-making capacity (MDC) in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI).
Design: Longitudinal study comparing control and TBI groups at hospitalization and at 6 months postinjury.
Setting: Inpatient brain injury rehabilitation unit.
Participants: Twenty healthy controls and 24 patients with moderate to severe TBI.
Interventions: Not applicable.
Main Outcome Measures: MDC was measured by using the Capacity to Consent to Treatment Instrument (CCTI). The CCTI evaluates performance on a series of 4 accepted consent abilities, or standards: S1 (evidencing/communicating choice), S3 (appreciating consequences), S4 (reasoning about treatment), and S5 (understanding the treatment situation and choices), and 1 experimental standard [S2] (making the reasonable treatment choice when the alternative choice is unreasonable). In addition, TBI patients were assigned 1 of 3 capacity outcomes (capable, marginally capable, incapable) for each standard.
Results: At hospitalization, TBI patients performed equivalently with controls on standards S1 and [S2] but significantly below controls on S3 ( P <.001), S4 ( P <.02), and S5 ( P <.001). At 6-month follow-up, TBI patients showed significant within-group improvement on these 3 standards (S3, S4, S5) but continued to fall significantly below controls on S3 ( P <.006) and S5 ( P <.001). A group by time interaction emerged on S5 ( P <.02). The TBI group showed increasing proportions of capable outcomes on all standards over the 6 months.
Conclusions: Patients with TBI showed initial impairment and subsequent partial recovery of MDC over a 6-month period. Complex consent abilities of appreciation, reasoning, and understanding were significantly impaired in hospitalized acute TBI patients. At follow-up, TBI patients showed substantial recovery of reasoning and partial recovery of appreciation and understanding consent abilities. The study suggests the importance in the rehabilitation setting of serial evaluations of MDC in patients with TBI.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2004.09.020 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!